Chicago IRS Tax Attorney

Chicago Tax Team - We help business professionals solve their IRS problems - FOREVER!

Call Us 312-664-6649
Free Consultation
  • IRS Radio Hour
    • IRS Radio Hour Show – 8/31
    • IRS Radio Hour Show – 8/23
    • IRS Radio Hour Show – 8/17
    • IRS Radio Hour Show – 8/10
    • IRS Radio Hour Show – 8/03
    • IRS Radio Hour Show – 7/27
    • IRS Radio Hour Show – 7/13
    • IRS Radio Hour Show – 7/06
    • IRS Radio Hour Show – 6/29
    • IRS Radio Hour Show – 6/22
    • IRS Radio Hour Audio
      • IRS Radio Hour – 6/15
      • IRS Radio Hour – 6/08
      • IRS Radio Hour – 6/01
      • IRS Radio Hour – 5/25
      • IRS Radio Hour – 5/18
      • IRS Radio Hour – 5/11
      • IRS Radio Hour – 5/04
  • Services
    • Tax Preparation
    • Tax Resolution
      • IRS Installment Agreement
      • IRS Currently Not Collectible
      • IRS Offer in Compromise
      • IRS Penalty Abatement
      • Presidential Tax Resolutions Timeline
    • Bankruptcy
      • Chapter 7
      • Chapter 13
    • Foreclosure Defense
  • About Us
    • Why Us
  • Testimonials
  • Today’s Tax Talk
    • Steven Leahy – Legal Questions Answered
  • Contact Us

IRS Installment Agreements

August 7, 2014 by admin

Steven A. Leahy
IRS Installment Agreements

By Steven A. Leahy

There are six things you can do if you owe the IRS money. First, you can simply write the IRS a check for the full amount. For many, that is simply not a realistic option. Often, if the tax obligation is not too significant, borrowing money from another source (friends, family, bank loan, credit cards, etc.) may be a less costly alternative than an installment agreement with the IRS. Second, you can enter into an IRS Installment Agreement; pay the IRS over time. Third, you can obtain an Offer-in-Compromise: A lump sum settlement for less than the tax owed. Fourth, you can be declared Currently Not Collectible; pay the IRS nothing for a time. Fifth, you can file for protection under the bankruptcy code; Chapter 7, Chapter 13 or Chapter 11. And the last option – you can do nothing, and let the IRS do what they will to you, your family and your assets.

This article addresses the second option – IRS Installment Agreements – for personal income taxes. IRS Installment Agreements allow taxpayers to pay the IRS in monthly installments rather than paying the IRS in full immediately. There are several different kinds of Installment Agreements: Guaranteed, Streamline, Partial and Full Pay. Each has unique characteristics. In most cases, just proposing an installment agreement will stop other IRS collection efforts (e.g. wage garnishment, levies). If an IRS Installment Agreement is rejected, the IRS may consider a revised proposal, or the taxpayer may appeal the rejection.

The Guaranteed Installment Agreement is designed for taxpayers with a tax obligation of less than $10,000.00 (excluding penalties and interest). If the taxpayer has also timely filed all income tax returns, paid any tax due for the last five years, has not had an installment in the last five years, and agrees to pay the amount due in 3 years, an installment agreement is virtually guaranteed, even if the taxpayer has the ability to pay the tax liability in full immediately.

The Streamlined Installment Agreement (SIA) is designed for individual taxpayers with a tax obligation not greater than $50,000.00. Recently, the IRS instituted the “Fresh Start” initiative. Fresh Start provisions changed the parameters for a SIA in several important ways. First, the IRS raised the threshold from $25,000.00 to $50,000.00 in tax liability. Next, under the new streamlined provisions, taxpayers can stretch repayment of their tax obligation over 72 months, rather than the old maximum of 60 months. Both of these changes have had a great impact for taxpayers.

The best part of a SIA is it is streamlined, meaning taxpayers do not have to provide financial data to the IRS in order to get an installment agreement. This makes the process quick and less intrusive.

A Partial Installment Agreement (PIA) is designed for taxpayers who are unable to pay the full amount they owe to the IRS. Taxpayers must reveal their financial circumstances, in detail, for a PIA. Negotiating a PIA with the IRS can be tricky – not something I would recommend taxpayers do by themselves. IRS standards and procedures are well known to the IRS, but not to taxpayers. The IRS uses this advantage to get the taxpayers to pay more per month than they may be able to afford. If this happens, a default on the PIA is just a matter of time. After a taxpayer defaults, they will find themselves back in collections, and facing levies and garnishments again.

The final kind of Installment Agreement (IA) is an agreement that pays the full amount due over time. If a taxpayer owes more than $50,000.00, the IRS will conduct a complete investigation of the taxpayer’s finances. They look at income, expenses, and assets, with supporting documents. Again, the amount of a taxpayer’s monthly payment will determine the success or failure of the IA. So, it is imperative to get the best IA payment possible, something best left to professionals.

So, if you owe the IRS and are unable to pay the full tax obligation immediately, you should consider an IRS Installment Agreement. Before you do anything, you should give me a call. We can discuss your options. Opem Tax Resolutions & The Law Office of Steven A. Leahy, PC (312) 664-6649. Call NOW to set up your FREE Consultation.

Filed Under: Uncategorized Tagged With: “Tax Relief Chicago”, back taxes, Chicago Tax Help, Help With IRS, IRS Installment Agreement, Tax Debts, Tax Solution

The IRS Tax Gap

August 4, 2014 by admin

Steven A. Leahy
IRS Tax Gap

By Steven A. Leahy

The IRS calculates the amount of tax liability that taxpayers do not pay on time – the difference between the true tax liability for a year and the amount that is paid on time –this calculation is defined as the IRS Tax Gap. The IRS reports the IRS tax gap every 5 years. According to the most recent IRS Tax Gap estimates (2012 for the 2006 tax year), the American public voluntarily complies with IRS regulations 83.7% of the time. To many, the compliance rate is astounding. With little or no action, only 16% of the potential tax revenue requires government action to collect. Add enforcement and late payments to that number and compliance jumps to 86.3%. These are the IRS’ own numbers.

IRS compliance rates have been steady since at least 2001. The IRS divides the IRS tax gap into three (3) components: non-filing, under-reporting, and underpayment. The biggest gap is attributed to under-reporting ($376 billion in 2006, up from $285 billion in 2001). Taxes lost due to non-filing accounted for the lowest percentage of the gap ($28 billion in 2006, $27 billion in 2001).

Compliance is highest just where you would expect – when a third party reports and/or withholds taxes. Only 1% of the IRS tax gap is attributed to this category of reporting. These numbers are also compiled from real numbers – W-2 and 1099 information. Amounts subject to little or no reporting requirements made up 56% of misreporting in 2006. But, because there isn’t any reporting, these numbers are estimates, rather than actual numbers.

While many point to the compliance rate as impressive, the IRS uses these numbers and points to the low compliance rate as proof the IRS needs to be more aggressive in their collection efforts and require additional reporting requirements to third parties. To be more aggressive, the IRS needs more money. The IRS estimates that every dollar spent on collection, the IRS receives six dollars in return.

Congress, however, has cut the IRS budget over the last several years. For 2015, Congress passed a budget that would cut the IRS enforcement by $1.2 billion dollars; almost a 10% cut. So reducing the tax gap will have to come from reporting.

You may have noticed the additional filing requirements recently implemented by the IRS. For example, the 2011 reporting year saw a new IRS form, Form 8949 “Sales and Other Dispositions of Capital Assets.” This form was designed to replace Schedule D1, and did so for 2013 and thereafter.

The change adjusts how brokers must report adjusted basis and whether any gain or loss on a sale is classified as short-term or long-term from the sale of “covered securities.” Previously, determining the basis of an asset was left to the taxpayer. These changes require additional reporting by third parties in an attempt reduce the tax gap. The IRS is always seeking new ways to require third parties to increase their reporting to decrease the chance of non-compliance.

If you need help with the IRS, you should work with a local law firm. Better, you should give me a call – Opem Tax Resolutions & The Law Office of Steven A. Leahy, PC (312) 664-6649. Call NOW to set up your FREE Consultation.

Filed Under: Uncategorized Tagged With: “Tax Relief Chicago”, Chicago Tax Help, IRS, IRS Help IL, IRS Levy, IRS Lien, IRS Tax Debt, IRS Tax Problem

IRS Collection Process

July 24, 2014 by admin

Steven A. Leahy
IRS Collection Process

By Steven A. Leahy

Resolving IRS problems is not easy. When a taxpayer owes the IRS, the IRS will send a bill, a “Notice” in IRS speak – This begins the four step collection process. Additional notices will follow – each directing the taxpayer to pay the outstanding balance, or set up a “payment solution.”

The initial notice (IRS Form CP 501) is generated by one of ten Regional Compliance Centers. IRS Form CP 501 is a reminder telling the taxpayer that there is a balance due on a tax account. Five weeks after the first notice, the compliance center will generate IRS Form CP 503, “Second Notice: You have unpaid taxes for 20xx.” IRS Form CP 503 uses a more urgent tone. Five weeks after IRS Form CP 503, the compliance center will generate IRS Form CP 504 “Notice of Intent to Levy: Intent to seize your property or rights to property Amount due immediately: $XX,XXX.XX.” Now, the IRS is taking things from you.

If the taxpayer does not respond to these notices, the account becomes delinquent. Delinquent accounts are assigned to the Automated Collection System (ACS) or the Collection Field function (CFf). Most accounts go to the ACS for collection efforts. Some accounts, however, go directly to CFf and are assigned to a Revenue Officer.

If the delinquent account is assigned to ACS, ACS employees will contact the taxpayer by telephone and try to work out a payment solution. The taxpayer may also call ACS to work out a payment solution. ACS maintains a computerized inventory system that has taxpayer information, including personal information (name, address, telephone number, date of birth, adjusted gross income and social security number), audit information, IRS collection information, and perhaps the taxpayer’s credit report and bank account information. ACS uses this information to assist them in their telephone collection efforts and enforced collection efforts. Enforced collection authorizes ACS to collect delinquent accounts via bank account levies, wage garnishments and levies on accounts held by other third parties (e.g. accounts receivables). Often delinquent accounts are forwarded on by ACS to CFf.

When an account reaches CFf, a Revenue Officer (RO) is assigned. The RO will be directly responsible for collecting the balance on the delinquent account. A RO may call the taxpayer, or even appear at their home or place of business. Being on the receiving end of a RO visit is never a good experience. Once a RO is assigned – that person is your contact person within the IRS. The RO can also direct enforced collection efforts – bank account levies, wage garnishments and levies on accounts held by other third parties (e.g. accounts receivables).

If a taxpayer disagrees with a decision by the IRS Collections office, there is an appeal process. Appeals are conducted by the IRS Office of Appeals – a separate and independent office. There are two main appeals procedures, Collection Due Process (CDP) and Collection Appeals Program (CAP). A CDP or CAP will often get a better result than dealing with ACS or a RO – but not always.

Before the IRS can levy your assets they must send the taxpayer IRS Letter 1058 “Final Notice – Notice of Intent To Levy And Notice of Your Right to A Hearing.” Use this last opportunity to resolve your IRS Problem. Generally, IRS Letter 1058 is sent via certified or registered mail. So, if you are experiencing IRS problems and you receive notice of a certified letter, GO TO THE POST OFFICE AND PICK IT UP.

If you are facing IRS Collection Efforts, you should work with a local law firm that understands the IRS Collection procedures and will work to get you the best deal possible. You should give me a call – Opem Tax Resolutions & The Law Office of Steven A. Leahy, PC (312) 664-6649. Call NOW to set up your FREE Consultation.

Filed Under: Uncategorized Tagged With: “Offer in Compromise”, “Owe Taxes”, “Tax Relief Chicago”, Chicago Tax Help, currently non collectible, IRS Help, IRS Help Chicago, irs options, IRS Tax Debt, Tax Help Chicago

Financial Analysis

July 17, 2014 by admin

Steven A. Leahy
Financial Analysis
IRS Resolutions, Loan Modifications, and Bankruptcy
By Steven A. Leahy

My office helps businesses and families resolve their financial problems. We focus on IRS problems, but we also help with foreclosure defense and bankruptcy. Resolving all of these problems has a similar approach.

We begin by gathering information about each new client. Everyone is unique, and has a unique financial situation. Our investigation employs a three step process. First, we inventory all the client’s assets. Next we register all their income. Finally, we catalog all their expenses.

First, we inventory all our client’s assets – Do they own a home, a car, stocks, bonds, or other financial instruments? Do they own a summer cottage, a boat, motorcycle or other large assets? We include bank and financial institution accounts, IRAs, ERISA, pensions, annuities, insurance policies and profit sharing plans. We list home furnishings, utility and landlord deposits, clothing, jewelry, computers, and audio/visual equipment. We catalog collections (stamps, coins, etc.), antiques, intellectual property (patents, copyrights, etc.), business equipment, and interests in partnerships, corporations or other business entities.

The second step is to register all their income, from whatever source. Common income sources include: wages, business profits, interest & rental income, annuities, retirements, pensions, etc.

Finally, we catalog their expenses. This is the critical step. Often the expenses used by creditor institutions are not real expenses, because IRS standards are substituted for actual expenses. This is true for IRS resolutions, but it may also be true for determining disposable income in Chapter 13 bankruptcy, and loan modifications. For example, the IRS has standards for housing and utilities, apparel and services (including shoes and clothing, laundry and dry cleaning, and shoe repair), food, housing supplies & personal care products. There are also standards for transportation expenses, including ownership, maintenance and public transportation expenses.

In addition to the IRS standard expenses, our clients often have additional expenses, not accounted for in the IRS list. These expenses are often disallowed by the IRS, another element that will add to an artificially high disposable income number.

If our client’s actual expenses are higher than the IRS standards and/or they have unclassified expenses, as is often the case, the “game is afoot.” Determining what you can actually pay, not what these false numbers dictate, takes time and effort. Each and every expense must be documented, reviewed and verified. Convincing the court, bank or IRS that they should use our numbers, rather than theirs is more an art than a science, but will make the difference between success and failure.

Subtracting expenses from income reveals your disposable income – the higher your expenses, the lower your disposable income, and vise-versa. Disposable income is the determinative variable. For example, an IRS installment agreement, offer-in-compromise or currently not collectible status, or your monthly trustee payment under chapter 13, are each decided based on disposable income.

Remember, defining disposable income is the critical factor. NEVER speak with the IRS or any creditor without conducting a full investigation. A disposable income number that is too high will ensure failure and more problems in the future. It’s that important. So, if you are experiencing financial problems, you should work with a local law firm that will fight to have your actual expenses considered. Better, you should give me a call – Opem Tax Resolutions & The Law Office of Steven A. Leahy, PC (312) 664-6649. I want to help! Call NOW to set up your FREE Consultation.

Filed Under: Uncategorized

Can My Hobby Be A Business?

July 10, 2014 by admin

Steven A. Leahy
Can My Hobby Be A Business?

By Steven A. Leahy

 

Do you use deductions for a side business to reduce your tax liability?  The IRS makes a distinction between business activity and activity that is a hobby, therefore not a business activity.    If the activity qualifies as a business, the taxpayer can deduct ordinary and necessary expenses used to conduct that business. However, if the activity is determined to be a hobby, losses from the activity cannot be used to offset other income.

Most side businesses are undertaken because the taxpayer enjoys the activity – being allowed to deduct the expenses for that activity is just a bonus.  The best way to qualify your hobby as a business is to earn a profit.  Generally, if an activity is undertaken with a reasonable expectation of earning a profit, it qualifies as a business.  The rule of thumb is – if the activity makes a profit during at least three of the last five years, including the current year, the activity is business activity.

This rule is not hard and fast.  For example, a documentary filmmaker – who lost money six years in a row, was permitted to deduct hundreds of thousands of dollars in film making expenses against her income as an attorney.  Tax Judge Kroupa recognized that some industries have longer start up periods than others, and the rule of thumb doesn’t account for those industries.

If you haven’t made a profit, here are some things you can do to demonstrate your intentions that this activity is for profit, rather than just for fun:

First, offer evidence that you expect to make a profit in the future.  As in the documentary filmmaker case, losses as a result of a slow start-up may be deductible if you can show that a profit in the future is possible.

Next, expend time and effort into the activity.  The more time and effort you demonstrate, the more likely the IRS will agree that the activity is a business.  For example, you should document the time you spend on the activity, open a separate bank account, keep accurate records, advertise the business, and comply with local, state and federal business requirements (i.e. permits, licensees, etc.).  All of these efforts demonstrate your intentions to make the activity profitable.

Finally, if the activity is not profitable, work on making it profitable. You can do this by changing the method of operations to attempt to make the activity profitable, seeking help from an expert to learn how to make the activity profitable, demonstrate an expertise in the activity – experts generally command a higher price.

There is a Tax Court case involving a track coach.  The coach lost money for eight years, and the IRS denied his deductions under section 183 of the tax code “activities not entered into for profit.” The Tax Court looked at his attempts to make his activity profitable, including those mentioned in this article, and decided his activities were intended to make a profit.

The best time to present these arguments is at the audit.  However, if a deficiency is assessed, the fight need not be over. So, if you are under audit, or have already had a deficiency assessed based on disallowed expenses for activities not entered into for profit, you should work with a local law firm that will fight the IRS findings on your behalf. Better, you should give me a call – Opem Tax Resolutions & The Law Office of Steven A. Leahy, PC (312) 664-6649.  I want to help! Call NOW to set up your FREE Consultation.

Filed Under: Uncategorized

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 97
  • 98
  • 99
  • 100
  • 101
  • …
  • 113
  • Next Page »

Listen to the PodCast!

IRS Radio Hour

Sunday at 5:00 pm
AM 560 The Answer
LISTEN HERE

Our Resources

  • Learn about Chicago Tax Resolution Law Firm »
  • Learn About Bankruptcy Chapter 7 »
  • Look at our blog for more information »
  • Expert IRS Tax Problems - How to Solve »
  • Timeline on IRS Tax Resolutions »
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Testimonials

Our Office

Our Office has represented Clients throughout Chicago & Northern Illinois. We represent many clients from Cook County; however, we have represented clients from:

DuPage County
Kane County
Kendall County
Grundy County

Lake County
McHenry County
Will County
LaSalle County

We have helped taxpayers in Wisconsin, California, Tennessee, and perhaps your state. No matter where you call home, we look forward to your telephone call for your FREE consultation.

2525 Waukegan Road * Suite 210 * Bannockburn, Illinois 60015
Telephone: (312) 664-6649

Opem Tax Advocates, The Law Office of Steven A. Leahy, PC, Attorneys & Lawyers  Bankruptcy, Chicago, IL

Disclaimer - Privacy Policy

All text and design is copyright © 2021 Opem Tax Advocates, LLC. All rights reserved