Chicago IRS Tax Attorney

Chicago Tax Team - Helping People & Companies Resolve their IRS Problems

Free Consultation

Achieve Full Financial Recovery

by

Steven A. Leahy

Achieve Full Financial Recovery

By Steven A Leahy

I have been helping people resolve their financial problems for more than fifteen years. I started my practice helping consumers file Chapter 7 bankruptcies. I quickly added Chapter 13 bankruptcy help. As part of my marketing, in the early 2000’s, when loan modifications were almost impossible, I targeted home owners facing foreclosure. Chapter 13 was really the only way to save someone’s home once they fell behind in mortgage payments, short of paying the full amount due, plus legal fees (reinstatement).

I should mention, I did help one homeowner with a loan modification before 2008 – only one. That case involved a cancer patient, who missed six months of mortgage payments while she underwent treatment. Once her treatment was complete and she was recovering, the mortgage company agreed to take the full amount she was behind and add it to the principle amount, then add time to the end of the loan. Her payment did not change, but she would have to pay on the loan longer. It was a sad, and happy, story. The story, I believe, was the only reason the mortgage company agreed to modify her loan.

In 2008, with the mortgage meltdown, the number and nature of the clients facing foreclosures changed. Many high income people lost their jobs or business owners suffered from the loss of their business. While Chapter 13 remained an option – loan modifications became a better option – because a loan modification often reduced the home owner’s monthly payments, in addition to resolving the foreclosure problem. I targeted my marketing to this segment of the market.

What I found out rather quickly, is that these clients were often facing IRS problems too. Around this time – 2009, I got involved with a national tax resolution group of attorneys who supported and educated me on how to solve IRS problems. Solving IRS problems fit perfectly with my skill set. In addition, it allowed me to help my clients achieve full financial recovery – help them save their home, resolve their IRS problems and end other credit problems. I have helped hundreds (thousands?) of Chicago area families and business resolve their financial problems and move on with their lives

This is what I have learned: People, mostly men – but not always, allow embarrassment and pride to get in the way of seeking help. Most of us believe everyone else is financially sound – we are the only one facing financial trouble. Not true.

One of my favorite stories to emphasis the falsity of this view involves a client I had in Chapter 13. Under Chapter 13, the debtor (homeowner) pays a monthly payment to a Trustee under a plan approved by the courts. At the time, the only form of payments the Trustee accepted were cashier’s checks, money orders or payroll deduction (recently, some form of online payments have been approved).

Every month my client went to the local branch of his bank and purchased a cashier’s check made payable to his Trustee Tom Vaughn (one of two Chapter 13 Trustees for Cook County). He often purchased the cashier’s check from the same Teller. After some months, the Teller said, “Do you mind if I ask you a question?” He said “sure.” The Teller asked, “I have customers come in here every day asking for cashier’s checks for this guy, Tom Vaughn. What the heck does Tom Vaughn do?”

That’s how many people in his neighborhood were in an active Chapter 13 bankruptcy. It leaves out those with an active Chapter 13 with another Trustee, those who sought protection under Chapter 7 bankruptcy, those facing IRS trouble, or those simply having financial problems. So, you aren’t alone.

If you need help solving your financial troubles, you should contact me right away. My name is Attorney Steven A. Leahy and I help people achieve full financial recovery. Call me at 312-664-6649. Call now!

Unpaid Payroll Taxes?

by

Steven A. Leahy

Unpaid Payroll Taxes?

By Steven A Leahy

This week I had the pleasure of meeting a very nice couple. They ran a business that was started by his parents more than 30 years ago. The business has provided a comfortable living for this couple and their family – until last year. Last year they had a big contract that was completed, but their bill went unpaid. This is how financial problems of a customer can spill over to just about any business.

Well, to complete the project required lots of manpower. That manpower required a big payroll. When a business has a payroll, that business is required to deduct federal and state taxes, Medicare and social security obligations, union dues, insurance and perhaps other expenses. The business is then mandated to turn that money, and the business’ own contributions, over to the various government and other entities on behalf of their employees. When that money is not turned over, the IRS will take action to collect the tax portion of those funds.

What happens when the business goes under and is unable to pay the outstanding obligations? Well, if the business was a corporation, or other limited liability entity, the owner may have some protection from the business taxes. However, the portion of the tax obligations that was deducted from the employee’s paycheck was the employees’ property, and the business held that money in trust for the employee.

So, the IRS will look to the person or persons responsible for collecting, accounting and paying over the taxes to the IRS. The IRS defines a “responsible person” as:

One who had the duty to perform or the power to direct the act of collecting, accounting for, or paying over trust fund taxes.

The owner of a business is almost always a “responsible person.” These “trust” taxes include three components: Federal Income tax withheld from the employee; social security and Medicare taxes withheld from the employee; and, the employer’s contribution to social security and Medicare. The “trust” portion is that portion deducted from the employees’ pay check – Federal Income Tax and the employees’ contribution to social security and Medicare. The employer’s contribution to social security and Medicare is not part of the trust taxes, because this tax was not paid by the employee and held in trust by the employer.

When the IRS looks to a responsible person individually to recover this tax, it is referred to as the Trust Fund Recovery Penalty (TFRP). If there is more than one responsible party, the obligation is joint and several – that means the IRS can collect all or part from any or all of the parties. However, the IRS can only recover once. So if the TFRP obligation is satisfied by one responsible party, the obligation of the other parties is also satisfied. Complicated, right?

It gets more complicated, because TFRP are never dischargable in bankruptcy and are difficult to walk away from. But, sometimes, it can be done. If you are having IRS problems you should seek help early. Better yet, you should call me, Steven A. Leahy of Opem Tax Resolutions and The Law Office of Steven A. Leahy, PC. I will sit down with you and explain how this all works and what you can do to protect yourself. Call me today at 312-664-6649. Tell Bonnie I asked you to call to set up a FREE consultation.

My Ex Claimed the Child Deduction – Now What?

by

Steven A. Leahy

My Ex Claimed the Child Deduction – Now What?

By Steven A Leahy

It’s August, and the IRS is starting to go after taxpayers who listed a child as a dependent, when another party listed that same child as a dependent. Who gets the deduction? This is the most common question I get around this time of year.

Here is the typical scenario. Parent A and Parent B live apart. The child lives with Parent A, but Parent B has joint custody. Parent A claims a dependency exemption on their tax return. Later, Parent A discovers Parent B has already claimed a dependency exemption on their tax return. Because a child’s social security number is necessary to claim a dependency exemption, the IRS’ computer system flags both returns and sends a notice of deficiency to each parent. The question rises, “Which Parent is entitled to claim a dependency exemption for tax purposes?”

First, let’s talk about what is at stake. The IRS provides as a deduction an exemption from taxable income ($4,000 for 2015) for each “dependent.” A dependent is defined as either a “qualifying child” or a “qualifying relative” of the taxpayer. To be considered a “qualifying child” of the taxpayer, the child must (among other things) have the same principal place of abode as the taxpayer for more than one-half of the taxable year. In addition, a qualifying child may enable a taxpayer to claim other benefits. Benefits like Head of Household, the child tax credit, the child and dependent care credit, and an earned income tax credit. In total, these benefits amount to thousands of dollars.

Generally, when parents are legally separated or divorced, the dependency exemption is awarded to the custodial parent. The custodial parent is the parent with whom the child lived for the greater number of nights during the year. But there are exceptions. If the custodial parent “signs a written declaration” releasing his or her claim to the exemption and the noncustodial parent “attaches such written declaration to the noncustodial parent’s return for the taxable year” the non-custodial parent can claim the exemption. The declaration by the custodial parent must be made on Form 8332 or in a signed document substantially similar to Form 8332.

Often, the non-custodial parent has a divorce decree, separation agreement, or some other agreement that spells out the rights of the non-custodial parent to claim the deduction. If the decree or agreement went into effect before 2009, the non-custodial parent can attach certain pages to the tax return instead of Form 8332. However, if the decree or agreement went into effect after 2008, the decree or agreement can’t be attached and the non-custodial parent must use Form 8332.

You can see how this can become a problem – parents at odds with who gets the tax benefits. The IRS has sided with the custodial parent; even if the divorce decree or agreement says the custodial parent has agreed to waive the right to claim an exemption for the child. If the custodial parent released a claim to exemption and signed Form 8332 granting the right to the non-custodial parent, the custodial parent can complete Part III of Form 8332 and revoke that waiver, as long as they provide a copy of the form (or make a reasonable effort to provide actual notice) to the non-custodial parent and attach the revocation to their own tax return for each year.

Yes, I know it is complicated. Dealing with the IRS is ALWAYS complicated. If you need help with the IRS, you should work with a local law firm. Better, you should give me a call – Opem Tax Resolutions & The Law Office of Steven A. Leahy, PC (312) 664-6649. Call NOW to set up your FREE Consultation.

What Organization is Tougher Than The IRS?

by

Steven A. Leahy

What Organization is Tougher Than The IRS?

By Steven A Leahy

Remember, there are only 6 things you can do if you owe the IRS money. Before you hire someone to help you resolve your IRS problem, make sure they offer you every option possible. Many (most) tax resolution companies are not law firms – even if they have an attorney working for them. That means they can’t offer you all your options.

Let us review the six things you can do. First, you can pay the IRS everything you owe them. Second, you can set up an installment agreement with the IRS. Pay them over time. Third, you can submit an Offer-in-Compromise, to pay a lump sum to settle the debt. Fourth, you can be declared currently not collectible – prove to the IRS you don’t have any disposable income after you pay all your monthly bills. Fifth, you can file for protection under one of the Chapters of the Bankruptcy laws. And, finally, you can continue to do nothing and let the IRS have their way with you.

Sometimes, the very best option – clearly – is filing for protection under the bankruptcy code. Unless the tax resolution company you talk to is a law firm experienced in bankruptcy – and non-attorneys can never be qualified to offer you advice about bankruptcy – you may never even be exposed to that option.

Most of my clients owe the IRS a sizable amount of money – and many are what can be defined as “above-median debtors.” That means their monthly income exceeds the median (average) income for the household of the same size as the debtors’ in the same state of residence. For these taxpayers, working out a solution with the IRS can be very difficult because, often, the IRS will not allow all of their actual expenses when determining a remedy. If their mortgage is higher than the IRS allows, their payments or settlement with the IRS will be too high to allow both payments. This may force the taxpayer out of their home or cause a default with the IRS agreement.

The only organization stronger than the IRS is the Federal Court System. That is why bankruptcy is sometimes the best option. If the IRS is insisting that you give up your home, they won’t release a levy or they insist on an unreasonable monthly payment, bankruptcy may be the answer.

For example, I have an above-median couple who has a large IRS obligation, a very high mortgage payment and find themselves behind on their mortgage payments. The IRS insisted on full payment over a short period of time; a payment that would not allow them to keep their home.

Under Chapter 13, the federal bankruptcy law changes the focus of their repayment plan from repayment of the IRS debt, to keeping their home. Under their Chapter 13 plan, these taxpayers will pay their monthly mortgage, pay down the mortgage arrears and pay the IRS a small portion of the IRS claim.

I had another client who came to see me after the IRS levied his employer – leaving him with zero income. We negotiated with the IRS Revenue Officer for a time, put he would not relent and release the levy. My client was concerned that he would be evicted from his apartment if he missed his rent payment. The day he filed for protection under the bankruptcy code, the IRS was forced to release the levy, my client received his pay check, paid his rent and proposed a plan to pay his creditors over five years.

These remedies aren’t possible in many (most) tax resolution firms. Taxes under the bankruptcy laws can get very complicated. That is why it is vital that you seek help from someone who can offer all available remedies, including bankruptcy. So, if you find yourself with an IRS Problem, call Opem Tax Resolutions and The Law Office of Steven A. Leahy at 312-664-6649.

Solving Your IRS Problem – And Keeping it Solved!

by

Steven A. Leahy

Solving Your IRS Problem – And Keeping it Solved!

By Steven A Leahy

Listeners to the IRS Radio Hour – heard every Sunday afternoon at 5:00 on AM 560 The Answer – know I help people and businesses solve their IRS problems. What I have learned is – solving the IRS problem is only step one. The next step is keeping the problem solved.

When you reach an agreement with the IRS – whether the remedy is an offer-in-compromise, installment agreement or being declared currently not collectible – there are other conditions of the agreement, conditions often overlooked by taxpayers. For example, here are the conditions included in a recent installment agreement we worked out for a client with the IRS. The IRS wrote:

The other conditions of this agreement are:

– You file and pay on time all federal and state taxes due during the term of the agreement.

– We’ll apply all installment agreement payments to the oldest tax assessments first, then penalties, then interest on that assessment.

– You pay all installment agreement user fees.

– You provide a current financial statement when we request one. If you have a change in your ability to pay, we can revise or cancel your installment agreement.

In addition, the IRS will “apply any refunds you’re due to the amount you owe until you pay your balance in full. A refund payment isn’t a substitute for a monthly payment.”

The first condition is the most common stumbling block. Taxpayers often fail to file and pay all federal and state taxes on time. On time, to the IRS, means NO EXTENSIONS. If you fail to meet any of these conditions, the IRS will cancel the agreement and the taxpayer will find themselves right back where they started.

That’s why, once we solve a client’s IRS problem we offer to continue monitoring the case under our IRS Protection Plan. Under the IRS Protection Plan, we continue covering our client with our Power of Attorney, so we continue to receive all IRS notices. We offer on-going advice about tax issues and we complete their annual tax returns. Occasionally the IRS will erroneously cancel an agreement, or cancel an agreement but agree to re-instate the agreement after a request is submitted. Our IRS protection plan covers those items too. In addition, if you do default, we will offer a discounted rate to work with the IRS on a new agreement.

Even if you don’t default, some agreements, such as partial installment agreements or currently not collectible status may be reviewed after some time, typically every 2 years. And the IRS Protection Plan will provide a discounted rate for that service also.

So, even after you fix your IRS problem, you have to remain vigilant. That’s where Opem Tax Resolutions and The Law Office of Steven A. Leahy, PC comes in with the IRS Protection Plan. Give me a call at 312-664-6640 to fix your IRS problem and KEEP the problem fixed!

Our Resources

Testimonials

Our Office

Our Office has represented Clients throughout Chicago & Northern Illinois. We represent many clients from Cook County; however, we have represented clients from:

DuPage County
Kane County
Kendall County
Grundy County

Lake County
McHenry County
Will County
LaSalle County

We have helped taxpayers in Wisconsin, California, Tennessee, and perhaps your state. No matter where you call home, we look forward to your telephone call for your FREE consultation.