Chicago IRS Tax Attorney

Chicago Tax Team - We help business professionals solve their IRS problems - FOREVER!

Call Us 312-664-6649
Free Consultation
  • IRS Radio Hour
    • IRS Radio Hour Show – 8/31
    • IRS Radio Hour Show – 8/23
    • IRS Radio Hour Show – 8/17
    • IRS Radio Hour Show – 8/10
    • IRS Radio Hour Show – 8/03
    • IRS Radio Hour Show – 7/27
    • IRS Radio Hour Show – 7/13
    • IRS Radio Hour Show – 7/06
    • IRS Radio Hour Show – 6/29
    • IRS Radio Hour Show – 6/22
    • IRS Radio Hour Audio
      • IRS Radio Hour – 6/15
      • IRS Radio Hour – 6/08
      • IRS Radio Hour – 6/01
      • IRS Radio Hour – 5/25
      • IRS Radio Hour – 5/18
      • IRS Radio Hour – 5/11
      • IRS Radio Hour – 5/04
  • Services
    • Tax Preparation
    • Tax Resolution
      • IRS Installment Agreement
      • IRS Currently Not Collectible
      • IRS Offer in Compromise
      • IRS Penalty Abatement
      • Presidential Tax Resolutions Timeline
    • Bankruptcy
      • Chapter 7
      • Chapter 13
    • Foreclosure Defense
  • About Us
    • Why Us
  • Testimonials
  • Today’s Tax Talk
    • Steven Leahy – Legal Questions Answered
  • Contact Us

How You Can Legally Settle Your Bad Debt, Avoid Foreclosure And Get A Fresh Beginning Starting Today…

April 1, 2015 by admin

Steven A. Leahy

How You Can Legally Settle Your Bad Debt, Avoid Foreclosure And Get A Fresh Beginning Starting Today…

By Steven A Leahy

On my radio show, The IRS Radio Hour, we talk a lot about helping people with financial problems. What I have discovered is when people have IRS problems, they often have other financial issues haunting them. My mission is to help as many people as I can achieve full financial recovery. That means, helping with more than just IRS problems. I help people with foreclosure issues, loan modifications, bankruptcy and other debt related problems.

A perfect case study can illustrate this approach:

Bob & Eddie (not their real names) ran a successful home repair business. But, because of health problems and the economic crash, their business seemed to disappear overnight. They were facing immediate foreclosure on two properties, bad debt law suits and massive IRS debt with liens & levies pending. Bob had given up and went into a state of depression. Eddie heard our ad and decided to see if I could help.

After meeting with me face to face, they decided to hire me to help them to full financial recovery. My team and I immediately began our investigation, filed our appearance in court on both of the Foreclosure Actions and our Power of Attorney with the IRS. We slowed down the foreclosure actions, and stopped the IRS collections efforts in order to give us time to complete our investigation.

In this case, after close consultations with Bob and Eddie, we represented them in a Chapter 7 bankruptcy. The bankruptcy resolved their bad debt issues, the threat of deficiency in the foreclosure cases and most, but not all, of their IRS problems.

After discharge of their Chapter 7 bankruptcy, Bob and Eddie were confident to start up a new business. With their new found freedom, they rebuilt their home repair business into a successful enterprise. We negotiated a loan modification on an investment property. Because the second foreclosure was pending more than 2 years after their discharge, they had an opportunity to save some money. In addition, we negotiated a cash for keys arrangement on their home, whereby they received $35,00.00 in cash upon surrender of the home.

Because we timed the chapter 7 correctly, much of their IRS debt was discharged in bankruptcy. There still remained, however, a small balance. We negotiated an installment agreement with the IRS and protected them from further levies and other IRS collection efforts.

Finally, they used this $35,000.00, in addition to money they saved during the duration of the foreclosure case, and purchased a new home. We represented them in the purchase of their new home and they moved on with their lives, in a new home, with a minimum payment to the IRS and free of any other debt.

So, if you have an IRS problem, you should consult with a local attorney. The strategy you use will make ALL the difference in how your life progresses. Before you do anything, you should give me a call. We can discuss your options, complete your an investigation and determine the best course of action. – Opem Tax Resolutions & The Law Office of Steven A. Leahy, PC (312) 664-6649. Call NOW to set up your FREE Consultation.

Filed Under: Uncategorized Tagged With: back taxes, bankruptcy chicago, debt help, foreclosure defense, IRS Tax Debt, short sale

Foreclosure Defense – Deficiency Protection II

January 15, 2015 by admin

Steven A. Leahy
Foreclosure Defense – Deficiency Protection II

By Steven A Leahy

Foreclosure is the process necessary for a mortgage lender (i.e. mortgagee) to take possession of a property because the borrower (i.e. mortgagor, homeowner) defaults on a contractual obligation to the mortgage lender, usually a default in payments. In Illinois, Mortgage foreclosures are governed by the Illinois Mortgage Foreclosure Law (IMFL) 735 ILCS 5/15-1101 et seq. (2013).

Illinois is a recourse state. The IMFL allows the public sale of property to pay a debt. If the public sale of the property does not generate enough money to pay off the borrower’s obligation to the mortgage company, the remaining balance is defined as a deficiency. Recourse loans allow the mortgage company to hold the homeowner (borrower) personally liable should the sale result in a deficiency.

If the homeowner is unable, or unwilling, to resolve the foreclosure case through reinstatement, redemption, litigation, loan modification, or Chapter 13 bankruptcy, the homeowner should concentrate on protecting themselves from a deficiency. There are at least six (6) ways to avoid a deficiency: Short Sales, Deed-in-lieu of foreclosure, consent foreclosure, shortened redemption, In rem judgment, & bankruptcy. This article will discuss consent foreclosures, shortened redemption and In rem judgments.

These three options are addressed in the IMFL: consent foreclosure, shortened redemption, and In Rem Judgment. Each protects the homeowner from a deficiency judgment. First, a consent foreclosure is an agreement between the parties to end the litigation by agreement. The homeowner agrees to a judgment and IMFL provides in return the mortgage company will “waive any and all rights to a personal judgment for deficiency against the mortgagor and against all other persons liable for the indebtedness or other obligations secured by the mortgage.”

Second, a shortened redemption period may be a remedy to protect the homeowner. The parties can agree that “the value of the mortgaged real estate as of the date of the judgment is less than 90% of the amount specified” and shorten the redemption period to 60 days rather than 3 months. If this order is entered, again, the mortgage company “waives any and all rights to a personal judgment for a deficiency against the mortgagor and against all other persons liable for the indebtedness or other obligations secured by the mortgage.”

Finally, an In Rem judgment is a judgment against the property, rather than the individual. “In rem” is a Latin term that means “against or about a thing.” So the judgment is directed toward the property, rather than toward a particular person (in personam – directed toward a particular person). If the judgment does not name a particular person, the mortgage company can’t collect the deficiency from the homeowner.

There are several reasons why one of these options may be used rather than a short sale or deed-in-lieu. First, if there are additional liens on the property, the mortgage company must go through with the foreclosure process in order to remove those liens from title. Because all parties are named in a foreclosure action, a judgment would be effective against all lien holders, thereby giving the buyer at auction (often the mortgage company) a clear title. In a short sale or deed-in-lieu, the lien holders can hold up the transfer and seek compensation for releasing the lien.

Another reason why one of these options may be desirable from the homeowner’s perspective is because the homeowner can avoid an investigation into their finances. If the homeowner has some assets that they prefer not to disclose, these judgments allow them to escape the deficiency to the mortgage company and maintain their privacy.

If you are facing foreclosure, you should take action. You need an attorney to help you sort through your options and choose the best remedy. Never hire a firm to help you with your foreclosure unless the firm is experienced in helping homeowners with all the possible remedies, loan modification, short-sales, deed-in-lieu, consent foreclosures, and bankruptcy. Before you do anything, you should give me a call. We can discuss all your options. Opem Tax Resolutions & The Law Office of Steven A. Leahy, PC (312) 664-6649. Call NOW to set up your FREE Consultation.

Filed Under: Foreclosure Tagged With: foreclosure defense, Illinois Mortgage Foreclosure Law, mortgage company, mortgage default

Foreclosure Defense – Deficiency Protection I

January 15, 2015 by admin

Steven A. Leahy
Foreclosure Defense – Deficiency Protection I

By Steven A Leahy

Foreclosure is the process necessary for a mortgage lender (i.e. mortgagee) to take possession of a property because the borrower (i.e. mortgagor, homeowner) defaults on a contractual obligation to the mortgage lender, usually a default in payments. In Illinois, Mortgage foreclosures are governed by the Illinois Mortgage Foreclosure Law (IMFL) 735 ILCS 5/15-1101 et seq. (2013).

Illinois is a recourse state. The IMFL allows the public sale of property to pay a debt. If the public sale of the property does not generate enough money to pay off the borrower’s obligation to the mortgage company, the remaining balance is defined as a deficiency. Recourse loans allow the mortgage company to hold the homeowner (borrower) personally liable should the sale result in a deficiency.

If the homeowner is unable, or unwilling, to resolve the foreclosure case through reinstatement, redemption, litigation, loan modification, or Chapter 13 bankruptcy, the homeowner should concentrate on protecting themselves from the deficiency. There are at least six (6) ways to avoid a deficiency: Short Sales, Deed-in-lieu of foreclosure, consent foreclosure, shortened redemption, In rem judgment, & bankruptcy. Because short sales and a deed in lieu are similar transactions, this article will discuss the first two options.

A short sale and a deed-in-lieu require the cooperation of the mortgage company. In both instances, the mortgage company typically conducts an investigation into the finances of the homeowner. That investigation resembles the process of a loan modification. The homeowner is asked to provide, bank statements, pay advices, tax returns, household budget and a hardship letter, along with other financial disclosures. The cooperation of the mortgage company often depends on the outcome of that investigation.

A short sale involves the sale of real estate where the proceeds of the sale fall short of the balance of the debts secured by liens against the property, and the lien holders agree to take less than the balance to release their lien. For example, Homeowner has a balance due the mortgage company of $150,000.00. But the sales price of the property is $110,000.00. Normally, this sale would not close without the homeowner making up the difference. However, in a short sale, the mortgage company agrees to accept the $110,000.00 and releases the lien on the property so the buyer receives a clear title.

A deed-in-lieu of foreclosure is an agreement whereby the mortgage company accepts the deed to the real estate outright instead of seeking a foreclosure judgment and sale. Often, the mortgage company will insist that a short sale be pursued before considering a deed-in-lieu, but not always. Placing the property on the market allows the mortgage company to determine the market value. In addition, should an offer be made on the property, the mortgage company will not have to take possession of the property, but realize the proceeds of the sale much faster than a deed-in-lieu would allow.

Short sales and deeds-in-lieu do not necessarily release the homeowner for the deficiency (the difference between the balance due and the amount the mortgage company accepts, $40,000.00 in our example). So, if you are considering a short sale or deed-in-lieu, read the agreement carefully to make sure you understand the consequences. Also, there may be tax implications to accepting these options, So, keep that in mind when making a decision.

If you are facing foreclosure, you should take action. You need an attorney to help you sort through your options and choose the best remedy. Never hire a firm to help you with your foreclosure unless the firm is experienced in helping homeowners with all the possible remedies, loan modification, short-sales, deed-in-lieu, consent foreclosures, and bankruptcy. Before you do anything, you should give me a call. We can discuss all your options. Opem Tax Resolutions & The Law Office of Steven A. Leahy, PC (312) 664-6649. Call NOW to set up your FREE Consultation.

Filed Under: Foreclosure Tagged With: foreclosure defense, Illinois Mortgage Foreclosure Law, mortgage company, mortgage default

Foreclosure Defense – Saving Your Home With Chapter 13

December 29, 2014 by admin

Steven A. Leahy
Foreclosure Defense – Saving Your Home With Chapter 13

By Steven A Leahy

Foreclosure is the process necessary for a mortgage lender (i.e. mortgagee) to take possession of a property because the borrower (i.e. mortgagor, homeowner) defaults on a contractual obligation to the mortgage lender, usually a default in payments. In Illinois, Mortgage foreclosures are governed by the Illinois Mortgage Foreclosure Law (IMFL) 735 ILCS 5/15-1101 et seq. (2013). There are at least three alternatives for a homeowner to defend against a foreclosure, litigation strategies, loan modifications, and Chapter 13 bankruptcy. This article will discuss the third alternative, Chapter 13 bankruptcy.

Illinois is a judicial foreclosure state. That means the mortgage company must file a mortgage foreclosure complaint with the court in the county where the property is located, and go through litigation in order to receive permission from the court to conduct a public sale. Under the IMFL, the homeowner has a period of redemption, during which the plaintiff (mortgage company) cannot sell the property. Redemption is the period of time that the mortgage company must accept full payment from the homeowner, instead of proceeding to the foreclosure sale. The period of redemption runs seven (7) months from the date of service of the summons to all defendants, or three (3) months from the date of entry of a judgment of foreclosure, whichever is longest.

Recently, we reviewed how foreclosures work in general and the IMFL in particular. When a defendant is served with a Complaint to Foreclose Mortgage, the next steps are crucial. Most foreclosure cases are never defended in court. Instead, homeowners contact their mortgage company (or mortgage servicing company) in order to work out an agreement. Usually, the homeowner is seeking a loan modification. While loan modifications can be a good remedy, what most don’t understand is, obtaining a loan modification may take many months. Sometimes, so long that it limits the homeowner’s other options to save their home.

Because loan modifications may take a long time, homeowners may look past the best option to save their home – Chapter 13 bankruptcy. If a homeowner files for protection under Chapter 13 of the bankruptcy code before the judicial sale occurs, the home may be saved, if the circumstances are right.

For example, a family may find themselves several months behind on their mortgage payments, due to a temporary job lay-off. Once the lay-off is over, the debtor can return to paying their regular monthly mortgage payments. But, because they are behind in payments, the mortgage company will not accept regular monthly payments unless the family can bring their mortgage account current. Chapter 13 will allow that family to pay the arrears over 60 months and require the mortgage company to accept the regular monthly payments while they are in Chapter 13. In this way the family can avoid foreclosure of their home.

The key factor is the size of the past due payments, plus legal fees and late charges (arrears). The longer it has been since a mortgage payment was made, the greater the arrears, and the less likely a workable chapter 13 plan can be proposed. If the loan modification takes too long, by the time the homeowner is denied a loan modification a Chapter 13 plan may be unworkable. Let’s put some numbers in my example.

Let us assume the homeowner’s monthly mortgage payment is $1,700.00, and the family has $30,000.00 in credit card debt. If the homeowner is 5 months behind in their mortgage, the arrears may reach $12,000.00 ($8,500.00 in past due mortgage payments + $3,500.00 in legal fees and late charges). A Chapter 13 plan may work if the plan pays 100% of arrears to the mortgage company and 10% of unsecured claims ($30,000.00 in credit card debt). The plan’s monthly payment would be around $270.00 ($12,000.00 + $3,000.00 + Trustee fees / 60 months), plus the regular monthly mortgage payment of $1,700.00: for a total of $1,970.00 monthly.

Now, let’s assume the homeowner is 15 months behind in mortgage payments. The chapter 13 plan payment would be around $500.00 per month ($25,500.00 + $3,000.00 + Trustee’s fees / 60 months). Add the plan payment to their regular monthly payments, and the number jumps to $2,200.00 per month.

In this example, the original mortgage terms are in effect. However, just because a homeowner files for protection under chapter 13 bankruptcy, doesn’t mean the homeowner can’t also seek a loan modification. So, if saving your home is the most important goal, Chapter 13 may be the best option.

If you are facing foreclosure, you should take action. You need an attorney to help you sort through your options and choose the best remedy. Never hire a firm to help you with your foreclosure unless the firm is experienced in helping homeowners with all the possible remedies, loan modification, short-sales, deed-in-lieu, consent foreclosures, and bankruptcy. Before you do anything, you should give me a call. We can discuss all your options. Opem Tax Resolutions & The Law Office of Steven A. Leahy, PC (312) 664-6649. Call NOW to set up your FREE Consultation.

Filed Under: Uncategorized Tagged With: Bankruptcy, chapter 13, foreclosure defense, Illinois Mortgage Foreclosure Law

Listen to the PodCast!

IRS Radio Hour

Sunday at 5:00 pm
AM 560 The Answer
LISTEN HERE

Our Resources

  • Learn about Chicago Tax Resolution Law Firm »
  • Learn About Bankruptcy Chapter 7 »
  • Look at our blog for more information »
  • Expert IRS Tax Problems - How to Solve »
  • Timeline on IRS Tax Resolutions »
  • 
  • 
  • 
  • 
  • 

Testimonials

Our Office

Our Office has represented Clients throughout Chicago & Northern Illinois. We represent many clients from Cook County; however, we have represented clients from:

DuPage County
Kane County
Kendall County
Grundy County

Lake County
McHenry County
Will County
LaSalle County

We have helped taxpayers in Wisconsin, California, Tennessee, and perhaps your state. No matter where you call home, we look forward to your telephone call for your FREE consultation.

2525 Waukegan Road * Suite 210 * Bannockburn, Illinois 60015
Telephone: (312) 664-6649

Opem Tax Advocates, The Law Office of Steven A. Leahy, PC, Attorneys & Lawyers  Bankruptcy, Chicago, IL

Disclaimer - Privacy Policy

All text and design is copyright © 2021 Opem Tax Advocates, LLC. All rights reserved