Chicago IRS Tax Attorney

Chicago Tax Team - We help business professionals solve their IRS problems - FOREVER!

Call Us 312-664-6649
Free Consultation
  • IRS Radio Hour
    • IRS Radio Hour Show – 8/31
    • IRS Radio Hour Show – 8/23
    • IRS Radio Hour Show – 8/17
    • IRS Radio Hour Show – 8/10
    • IRS Radio Hour Show – 8/03
    • IRS Radio Hour Show – 7/27
    • IRS Radio Hour Show – 7/13
    • IRS Radio Hour Show – 7/06
    • IRS Radio Hour Show – 6/29
    • IRS Radio Hour Show – 6/22
    • IRS Radio Hour Audio
      • IRS Radio Hour – 6/15
      • IRS Radio Hour – 6/08
      • IRS Radio Hour – 6/01
      • IRS Radio Hour – 5/25
      • IRS Radio Hour – 5/18
      • IRS Radio Hour – 5/11
      • IRS Radio Hour – 5/04
  • Services
    • Tax Preparation
    • Tax Resolution
      • IRS Installment Agreement
      • IRS Currently Not Collectible
      • IRS Offer in Compromise
      • IRS Penalty Abatement
      • Presidential Tax Resolutions Timeline
    • Bankruptcy
      • Chapter 7
      • Chapter 13
    • Foreclosure Defense
  • About Us
    • Why Us
  • Testimonials
  • Today’s Tax Talk
    • Steven Leahy – Legal Questions Answered
  • Contact Us

Supreme Court Stealing Our Liberty

July 13, 2015 by admin

Steven A. Leahy
Supreme Court Stealing Our Liberty

By Steven A Leahy

Over the next several weeks I am going to review recent Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) opinions that, in my opinion, evidence of our diminishing liberty. Each time the SCOTUS decides a case that is clearly not based on the Constitution or the actual language of the statute – the citizens lose; even if one may agree with the outcome.

The four cases from this last session I will review are KING ET AL. v. BURWELL (King v. Burwell), SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, ET AL., ARIZONA STATE LEGISLATURE v. ARIZONA INDEPENDENT REDISTRICTING COMMISSION (Az State Legislature v. AIRC), OBERGEFELL ET AL. v. HODGES, DIRECTOR, OHIO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, ET AL. (Obergefell v. Hodges), and TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY AFFAIRS ET AL. v. INCLUSIVE COMMUNITIES PROJECT, INC., ET AL. (Texas DOHCA v. ICPI).

Let’s begin with a summary of each case and the issues the court faced. King vs. Burwell is the case involving the Affordable Care Act (ObamaCare). The court was asked to determine if the words “Exchange established by the State” means “Exchange established by the State.” In Obergefell v. Hodges, the court was asked to determine if the Constitution Regquires every state in the Union to recognize same sex marriage. The Court in AX State Legislature v. AIRC was asked if the word “Legislature” really means “The people.” And finally, in Texas DOHCA v. ICPI the court was asked if discrimination, to be actionable, must be intentional, or can a statistical analysis showing “disparate impact” on minorities be enough to prove “unconscious prejudices.” such a way as to make the statute unnecessary.

The SCOTUS, with these decisions, has eroded all of our freedoms. This trend is only growing more brazen with each passing term. If our Constitution and our statutes mean what 5 judges say it means, no matter the words used, then we are no longer a nation of laws – we have become a nation of subjects.

Justice Scalia, Thomas and even Roberts have some harsh words for their colleagues dissenting from these decisions. At least they recognize the danger we are all in when our Constitution becomes a “living breathing document,” with absolutely no meaning at all. Many have fought and died for that document. All of our federal leaders have taken an oath to uphold the Constitution. These decisions should demonstrate the disconnect between that oath, and their actions.

My office protects businesses and families from the IRS; the biggest, baddest federal agency in our government. If you are facing IRS problems, you should give me a call. We can discuss your options in fighting the IRS. – Opem Tax Resolutions & The Law Office of Steven A. Leahy, PC (312) 664-6649. Call NOW to set up your FREE Consultation.

Filed Under: Uncategorized Tagged With: Chicago Tax Help, fix irs problems, IRS, IRS Options Help, liberty, SCOTUS, Tax Problem Help

IRS Lien vs Levy

February 26, 2015 by admin

Steven A. Leahy
IRS Lien vs Levy

By Steven A Leahy

On the IRS Radio Hour I often talk about the way the IRS works. The most important aspect of how the IRS works goes directly to how the IRS can collect assessed taxes from taxpayers, outside of voluntary agreements, like installment agreements, offers-in-compromise, currently not collectible, and bankruptcy. When a taxpayer ignores, or otherwise fails to negotiate a work out with the IRS, the IRS may take some drastic actions. The most dramatic action is a levy. This article will clear up IRS Lien vs Levy.

Many taxpayers confuse a levy and a lien. A federal tax lien is the federal government’s legal claim against a taxpayer’s property when a taxpayer neglects or fails to pay a tax debt. The IRS files a public document, the Notice of Federal Tax Lien, with the county recorder to alert the taxpayer’s creditors that the federal government has a legal right to the taxpayer’s property. A lien does not result in seizure of any of the taxpayer’s property.

A federal levy, on the other hand, is a legal seizure of a taxpayer’s property to satisfy a tax debt. If a taxpayer fails to pay the assessed tax, or make satisfactory arrangements to settle the debt, the IRS may seize any type of asset, real or personal.

There is a three-pronged procedure in place the IRS must follow in order to justify a levy. First, after the IRS assesses a tax, they must send a Notice and Demand For Payment. Second, the taxpayer must neglect or refuse to pay the tax. Finally, the IRS must send the taxpayer a Final Notice of Intent to Levy and Notice of Your Right to A Hearing. The Taxpayer has 30 days from the date of that notice to request a Collection Due Process hearing with the Office of Appeals.

Once the IRS fulfills their obligations under the three-pronged procedure, they can seize any property the taxpayer is holding (including, cars, boats, houses), or any property someone else is holding (wages, retirement accounts, bank accounts, rental income, accounts receivables, cash value of life insurance or commissions).

In my practice I have seen levies against rental income – the revenue officer actually visited the taxpayer’s tenants each month to collect the rent before the taxpayer could collect; levies against insurance payments due a doctor – the IRS ordered all insurance carriers to send all payments to the IRS; levies on commissions – the IRS contacted the contract employer and levied, took, all commissions the taxpayer was due. A Taxpayer should never under-estimate the creativity of an IRS Revenue Officer looking to levy assets to collect on an IRS obligation.

The two most common levies involve bank accounts and wages; low hanging fruit. Remember, a bank must report any interest paid of at least $10.00 with form 1099-int. So, the IRS knows where most every taxpayer banks. Once a bank receives a Notice of Levy, the taxpayer’s account is frozen – the bank must hold any money in the account, up to the amount you owe, for twenty-one days. After twenty-one days the bank must send the money, plus interest, to the IRS. Any money deposited in the account after the date of levy, is NOT included in the levy. However, the IRS can issue more than one levy on the same account. I have seen accounts levied each week for months on end.

Finally, the levy most taxpayer’s fear is the wage levy. A wage levy is often referred to as a wage garnishment. The IRS issues a wage levy to the taxpayer’s employer, and the employer is obligated to send all net income, less exemptions, to the IRS CONTINUOUSLY. The more a taxpayer makes, the more the IRS will take. Generally, the exemptions are calculated by determining the standard deduction and the amount deductible for exemptions on an income tax return for the year the levy is served, divided by Fifty-two. The exempt income is designed to provide minimal sustenance – not enough to pay your expense. To do that, the taxpayer must work out an agreement with the IRS.

If you are facing IRS Collection Efforts, you should work with a local law firm that understands the IRS Collection procedures and will work to get you the best deal possible. You should give me a call – Opem Tax Resolutions & The Law Office of Steven A. Leahy, PC (312) 664-6649. Call NOW to set up your FREE Consultation.

Filed Under: IRS Radio Hour Tagged With: “Owe Taxes”, back taxes, Chicago Tax Help, Help With IRS, IRS Levy, IRS Lien, irs options, IRS Options Help, IRS problem, IRS Tax Debt, Offer in Compromise IRS, Tax Debts, Tax Help Chicago, tax options Chicago, Tax Problem Help, tax resolution, taxes and bankruptcy

IRS Audits – What are they looking for?

February 26, 2015 by admin

Steven A. Leahy
IRS Audits – What are they looking for?

By Steven A Leahy

The IRS calls an audit an “Examination of Returns.” The IRS accepts most federal tax returns just as they are filed. Some returns, however, are selected for review. The IRS selects returns for audit by computerized screening, random sample, or by an income document matching program. An examination can take place in several ways. Some audits are handled exclusively by US Mail, in the taxpayer’s home or place of business, at an IRS office or at your representative’s office. The time, place, and manner of the audit are negotiable.

Here are nine “red flags” the IRS uses to select a return to audit:

1. Make a mistake on your tax return – Gross errors will bring immediate scrutiny to your return and cause the IRS to audit your return. Simple math errors, not signing a paper return, leaving off or incorrectly listing your social security number are common ways to invite IRS scrutiny.

2. Round off the entries on your tax form – Generally, life doesn’t happen in round numbers. If you use round numbers, it tells the IRS that the numbers may be fictitious, or at least not accurate.

3. File late, or not at all – When you file late, the return is not processed with the hoard of annual filers. Instead, your return will be processed by a person, looking at the details of your return.

4. Be a Tax Protester – Tax protesters don’t believe the IRS has legitimate authority to collect taxes and they thumb their nose at the IRS by filing returns that indicate zero tax owed (if a tax protester files a return at all). Tax protestors can count on the IRS assigning a revenue agent to review it.

5. Have unreported Foreign accounts – Foreign banks have been reporting American account holders to the IRS for some time now. So, even if you don’t report the foreign account, you can be assured that the foreign financial institution will.

6. Don’t report some income – Companies are to issue a 1099 for any payments over $600.00 or W-2s to employees. So, if you don’t report some income, the company that paid you will likely report the payment in a 1099 or W-2 and the IRS will have the paperwork to match against your return.

7. Claim large charitable contributions – This is an easy target for the IRS. The IRS can simply audit you by mail and ask for substantiation for all deductions.

8. Take a repeated loss on a home based business – If a business loses money for 3 out of 5 years, the IRS considers that activity to be a hobby, not a business. If it is a hobby, you can only deduct losses equal to or less than income. You can’t use the losses in a hobby to offset taxes from other income.

9. Use an unscrupulous tax preparer – When the IRS notices a specific tax preparer is preparing returns that generate large refunds the IRS is likely to audit ALL the taxpayers who used that tax preparer. So, be careful whom you hire.

Generally, the IRS has three years from the due date to audit a return. That explains why the IRS will usually conduct an audit for three consecutive years, rather than just one. There are exceptions to the three year rule. For example, if you underreport your income by more than twenty-five percent, the IRS has six years to audit. And, if a taxpayer files a fraudulent or false return, there isn’t a time limit on an audit.

So, if you are facing an IRS audit, or have already been audited, you should work with a local law firm that will work to get you through the audit process and collections in the best way possible. You should give me a call – Opem Tax Resolutions & The Law Office of Steven A. Leahy, PC (312) 664-6649. Call NOW to set up your FREE Consultation.

Filed Under: IRS Radio Hour Tagged With: “Owe Taxes”, back taxes, Chicago Tax Help, Help With IRS, IRS Levy, IRS Lien, irs options, IRS Options Help, IRS problem, IRS Tax Debt, Offer in Compromise IRS, Tax Debts, Tax Help Chicago, tax options Chicago, Tax Problem Help, tax resolution, taxes and bankruptcy

IRS – Fresh Start Initiative

November 26, 2014 by admin

Steven A. Leahy
IRS – Fresh Start Initiative

By Steven A Leahy

In 2011, the IRS implemented a new program to help taxpayers pay back taxes and avoid tax liens. The IRS calls this new program the Fresh Start Initiative. “This phase of Fresh Start will assist some taxpayers who have faced the most financial hardship in recent years,” Said former IRS Commissioner Doug Shulman. “It is part of our multiyear effort to help taxpayers who are struggling to make ends meet.”

The “Fresh Start” initiative changed several important IRS programs. The program was directed to help taxpayers with installment agreements, Offers-in-Compromise & tax liens. The Fresh Start initiative expanded streamlined installment agreements. Installment agreements allow taxpayers to pay the IRS over time. Streamlined agreements remove the cumbersome disclosure requirements that normally apply to IRS installment agreements. The IRS program increased the threshold for total tax debt from $25,000.00 to $50,000.00. The number of installments acceptable from the IRS was increased from 60 months to 72 months. These two changes provide much relief to a very large number of taxpayers.

The Fresh Start initiative also changed the Offer-in-Compromise program. An Offer-in-Compromise is an agreement that allows taxpayers to pay less than the full amount due in order to settle their IRS obligation. The initiative gave the IRS more flexibility when calculating a taxpayer’s “reasonable collection potential.” The amount the IRS will accept for an Offer-in-Compromise depends on three major factors – the taxpayer’s monthly disposable income, the multiplier, and the taxpayer’s assets. The reasonable collection potential is calculated: (taxpayer’s monthly disposable income) x (the multiplier) + (value of assets).

Disposable income is the difference between a taxpayer’s income and their expenses. The IRS uses national standards when calculating expenses, not the taxpayer’s actual expenses. Historically, the IRS did not consider many of the taxpayer’s actual debts. Under the initiative, the IRS will now allow taxpayer’s to deduct student loan payments and monthly payments for state and local delinquent taxes. The national standards now also include a “miscellaneous” allowance. The miscellaneous allowance can be used for credit card payments and other debts that were previously not considered. The additional expenses will reduce the calculated monthly disposable income.

The biggest change concerns the multiplier used to calculate the amount the IRS will settle the debt. Once a taxpayer’s disposable income is calculated, the IRS uses the multiplier to calculate the cash component. If the taxpayer can pay the lump sum in five or fewer months, the IRS multiplier was 48 (4 years). Now, that multiplier is 12 (1 year). If the taxpayer can pay in 6 to 24 months, the multiplier was reduced to 24 (2years) from 60 (5 years). The decreased multipliers significantly reduce the reasonable collection potential calculated to settle an IRS obligation.

The asset calculation has also been reduced. The IRS will use 80% of the value of assets, overlook some dissipated assets and forego any equity in income producing assets in calculating the asset portion of the offer-in-compromise. All of these changes have the effect of lowering the calculated “reasonable collection potential.”

Finally, the Fresh Start initiative changed IRS policy concerning Tax Liens. A Federal Tax Lien secures the IRS’s interest in property when a taxpayer fails to pay their tax obligation and alerts creditors of the government’s claim. The initiative increased the tax obligation to $10,000.00, from $5,000.00 before the IRS will file a federal tax lien (in most cases). The initiative also made it easier to remove a lien. For example, if the outstanding tax obligation is less than $25,000.00 (even if you paid down your obligation to under $25,000.00) and you agree to an installment agreement to pay the full amount through a direct debit agreement, the IRS will agree to withdraw the Federal Tax Lien. But, the taxpayer must be in full compliance with other filing requirements, made 3 consecutive monthly payments and there wasn’t a previous default.

The IRS Fresh Start Initiative may be just what you need. To find out if this program will work for you, you should give me a call. We can discuss your all your options. Opem Tax Resolutions & The Law Office of Steven A. Leahy, PC (312) 664-6649. Call NOW to set up your FREE Consultation.

Filed Under: Uncategorized Tagged With: “Tax Relief Chicago”, back taxes, Chicago Tax Help, Help With IRS, IRS Help Chicago, IRS Options Help, IRS Tax Debt, tax attorney chicago, Tax Help Chicago, tax options Chicago, Tax Problem Help

IRS Madness – Reefer Rules

November 21, 2014 by admin

Steven A. Leahy
IRS Madness – Reefer Rules

By Steven A Leahy

On Tuesday, November 4, 2014, Oregon, Alaska and the Washington D.C. made recreational use of marijuana legal. Twenty-one other states allow medical use of marijuana. Illinois now accepts applications from patients for the “Medical Cannabis Pilot Program.” Businesses have sprung up around the country to accommodate the new demand. But the federal government has laws against marijuana – and the IRS enforces those laws through our tax policy. This article will examine our tax laws as applied to those in the “Canabusiness.”

IRS Code Section 280E “prohibits taxpayers[] from deducting any expense of a trade or business that consists of the trafficking of a controlled substance such as marijuana.” Section 280E was drafted in response to a 1974 case involving a Minneapolis drug dealer. After his arrest, the IRS audited him and assessed taxes based on his drug deals. The convicted drug dealer reduced his tax burden by deducting his drug dealing expenses. He included traveling expenses, rent, telephone, equipment, etc. Congress decided to close the drug dealer loop hole and adopted 280E.

Now that states and jurisdictions have legalized the recreational use of marijuana and have permitted medical use of marijuana the tax laws have changed, right. Well not exactly. Under the federal Controlled Substances Act, Marijuana is still a “controlled substance.” The United State Supreme Court has held that “no exception in the Controlled Substances Act exists for marijuana that is medically necessary.”

A number of cannabis dispensaries have found out what this apparent contradiction means. Early on, the IRS interpreted the prohibition to mean that cannabis dispensaries are not permitted any deductions for income tax purposes, including the cost of goods sold. That means dispensaries would be taxed on the gross sales rather than net sales. In a 2012 case heard by the Tax Court in California, Judge Kroupa narrowed that interpretation, holding that the cost of goods sold (COGS) “is not a deduction [] but is subtracted from gross receipts in determining a taxpayer’s gross income.” Therefore, COGS can be used by cannabis dispensaries to reduce taxable income. Other expenses (wages, rent, utilities, etc), however, are deductions and prohibited to cannabis dispensaries under the code. Obviously, the loss of any deduction can make a big difference at tax time.

To add to the burdens of cannabis dispensaries, the IRS assesses a 10% penalty on businesses that pay their federal employee withholding taxes in cash, according to the Denver Post. The Controlled Substances Act also prohibits banks from doing business with cannabis dispensaries. The Justice Department and Treasury have changed some regulations to address the concerns of the banking industry. But the banks are still not comfortable with the change of regulations without a change in the law.

Frank Keating, president of the American Bankers Association said “While we appreciate the efforts by the Department of Justice and FinCEN, guidance or regulation doesn’t alter the underlying challenge for banks.” He continued, “as it stands, possession or distribution of marijuana violates federal law, and banks that provide support for those activities face the risk of prosecution and assorted sanctions.”

The banking rules create other problems for cannabis dispensaries. For example, dispensaries can’t get credit card processing accounts, checking accounts or saving accounts. The lack of banking services means the dispensaries deal as a cash business. The large amounts of cash create security problems and IRS reporting concerns.

Those in the canabusiness have been struggling with these IRS problems. If you have IRS problems, you should take action. You need an attorney to help you sort through your options and choose the best remedy. Before you do anything, you should give me a call. We can discuss all your options. Opem Tax Resolutions & The Law Office of Steven A. Leahy, PC (312) 664-6649. Call NOW to set up your FREE Consultation.

Filed Under: Uncategorized Tagged With: “Tax Options”, cannabis, Chicago Tax Help, Help With IRS, IRS Help Chicago, IRS Options Help, marijuana, reefer

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • …
  • 7
  • Next Page »

Listen to the PodCast!

IRS Radio Hour

Sunday at 5:00 pm
AM 560 The Answer
LISTEN HERE

Our Resources

  • Learn about Chicago Tax Resolution Law Firm »
  • Learn About Bankruptcy Chapter 7 »
  • Look at our blog for more information »
  • Expert IRS Tax Problems - How to Solve »
  • Timeline on IRS Tax Resolutions »
  • 
  • 
  • 
  • 
  • 

Testimonials

Our Office

Our Office has represented Clients throughout Chicago & Northern Illinois. We represent many clients from Cook County; however, we have represented clients from:

DuPage County
Kane County
Kendall County
Grundy County

Lake County
McHenry County
Will County
LaSalle County

We have helped taxpayers in Wisconsin, California, Tennessee, and perhaps your state. No matter where you call home, we look forward to your telephone call for your FREE consultation.

2525 Waukegan Road * Suite 210 * Bannockburn, Illinois 60015
Telephone: (312) 664-6649

Opem Tax Advocates, The Law Office of Steven A. Leahy, PC, Attorneys & Lawyers  Bankruptcy, Chicago, IL

Disclaimer - Privacy Policy

All text and design is copyright © 2021 Opem Tax Advocates, LLC. All rights reserved