Chicago IRS Tax Attorney

Chicago Tax Team - We help business professionals solve their IRS problems - FOREVER!

Free Consultation

IRS 1099-A 1099-C Confused Yet?

by

Steven A. Leahy

IRS 1099-A 1099-C Confused Yet?

It’s tax season. Each year, at tax time, many taxpayers receive a 1099 A or a 1099 A and have no idea how to handle them. So, many just ignore the forms and go about filing (or not filing) their tax return. This is a BIG mistake!

Form 1099 C – Cancellation of Debt – is a form used by financial institutions to report cancelled debt to the IRS. “Cancelled Debt” is debt that has been cancelled or forgiven for less than the full amount.

Form 1099 A – Acquisition or Abandonment of Secured Property – is a form used by lenders if they acquire secured property in full or partial satisfaction of a debt, or they have reason to know that the property has been abandoned. Does that make it clear? Who must file? When do you “reasonably know” the property is abandoned? Trying to decipher these definitions is the subject of many Judges’ opinions.

As the borrower, you receive these forms and must respond. But how? Often, a lender will send a 1099 A and a 1099 C. What happens then? If there are multiple borrowers, each may receive a form for the full amount. Whom must report? A borrower may receive multiple forms, if there are multiple lenders to the same piece of property. All good questions – without straight forward answers.

First, Form 1099 A. Typically, a homeowner will receive a 1099 A from a lender(s) after a piece of property is foreclosed. For tax purposes, a foreclosure is treated as a sale. The borrower must calculate capital gains or losses. Since the property wasn’t sold, there isn’t a selling price. Instead, the borrower uses the information on 1099 A as the date of sale [Box 1] and the selling price of the property. The borrower may use the fair market value [Box 4], or the outstanding balance [Box 2]. How to report the foreclosure on your tax return depends on the nature of the property (primary residence?), the state the property is located, and the purchase price.

Next, Form 1099 C. If you receive a 1099 C for a foreclosed property, you should not (but may) receive a 1099 A. Because the 1099 C has the same information as 1099 A, and also includes the additional information that the debt has been cancelled. Cancelled debt may require the borrower to report the cancelled amount as income. That’s right – you couldn’t pay the debt, but the IRS may add the cancelled amount to your gross income and require you to pay income tax on that amount. Talk about kicking you when you’re down.

The good news is, sometimes there are exceptions and often the borrower may exclude the forgiven debt from income. For example, if the debt was discharged in Title 11 Bankruptcy, if the borrower was technically insolvent for an amount greater than the forgiven debt, or if the debt was forgiven on a qualified principal residence.

All this can get VERY complicated! If you receive one or more of these forms in any tax year, I suggest you find a good tax preparer. Do not ignore the forms AND do not prepare your own return. I help people get out of the trouble caused by those you take care to this matter themselves. Get help! Here’s an idea – Call Opem Tax Resolutions & The Law Office of Steven A. Leahy, PC (312) 664-6649. Call NOW to set up your FREE Consultation.

Cash is King! IRS Form 8300

by

Steven A. Leahy

Cash is King – IRS Form 8300

By Steven A Leahy

Recently, I received a telephone call from a business owner in his accountant’s office. They wanted some information about large cash payments the business received 18 months prior. I immediately shut the conversation down and insisted they come to my office if they wanted to discuss this matter with me. I did that because, with the accountant privy to our conversation, the conversation conflicted with the traditional doctrine of attorney-client privilege. What they were discussing possibly involved illegal activity, and not something you want to talk about in mixed company.

Federal law requires that all cash payments more than $10,000.00 must be reported to the IRS with Form 8300. In general, the law requires that anyone engaged in a trade or business – “in the course of such trade or business, receives more than $10,000.00 in cash in 1 transaction (or 2 or more related transactions)” shall file the proper cash transaction forms. If Form 8300 is required, it must be filed within 15 days after the date the cash transaction occurred. Form 8300 must include “the name, address, and TIN of the person from whom the cash was received.”

Not only must you file IRS Form 8300, you must furnish a “written statement” to each person “from whom the cash was received.” That written statement must be provided “on or before January 31 of the year following the calendar year for which [Form 8300] was required to be made.”

A transaction could be the sale of a machinery, construction work for a home owner, or repair work for a vehicle. The cash payment can be a lump sum of $10,000.00 or more; Installment payments that cause total cash received within one year of the initial payment to total more than $10,000.00, or; Previously unreported payments that cause the total cash received within 12-month period to total more than $10,000.00.

For example, let’s say a customer agrees to buy a piece of equipment for $14,000.00. He pays you $9000.00 in a cashier’s check and the balance 10 days later with $5,000.00 cash. This is a cash transaction and must be reported. You have received more than $10,000.00 cash. Because “Cash” may include cashier’s checks, bank drafts, travelers checks and money orders with a face value of $10,000.00 or less. Confused yet?

Wait, there’s more. The law also requires that you report suspicious transactions. For example, if you suspect the customer is attempting to prevent a Form 8300 from being filed – you must file Form 8300. What you must NOT do – EVER – is help the customer structure the transaction to avoid the Form 8300 reporting requirement.

Failure to file Form 8300, when required, may result in civil penalties. The penalties can amount to millions of dollars. Worse, a person may be subject to criminal penalties. The criminal penalties are generally for willful behavior, and include fines up to $100,000.00 and/or imprisonment up to 5 years, plus the cost of prosecution. The criminal penalties apply to those whom attempt to structure the transaction in such a way that would make it seem unnecessary to file Form 8300.

Receiving cash payments in a transaction can cause BIG problems. Who must file Form 8300, when that form must be filed, what constitutes cash, the transactions that trigger the requirement and the penalties that follow non-compliance are often difficult to understand. Don’t play games – get advice!

So, if you receive large cash payments, you should work with a local law firm that will work with you to stay in compliance with these complicated laws. You should give me a call – Opem Tax Resolutions & The Law Office of Steven A. Leahy, PC (312) 664-6649. Call NOW to set up your FREE Consultation.

Are You In A Vicious IRS Circle?

by

Steven A. Leahy

Are You In A Vicious IRS Circle?

By Steven A Leahy

Here is the problem I see all the time. Someone has an IRS problem. They work to solve the IRS problem themselves. While they work on fixing their problem, instead of going away, the problem grows. It grows because they fail to address their current IRS obligations.

I helped a family who owed the IRS more than $60,000.00. The father ran his own business. He was very good at his profession – but the paperwork got to be a problem. Several years ago, the April 15th deadline to file his tax return was approaching and he needed more time to complete his tax returns. So, he filed IRS Form 4868 – Application for Automatic Extension of Time to File U.S. Individual Income Tax Return. As the name of the form indicates, the extension is automatic. The filing date is then extended to about October 15 of the same year (depending on the Washington DC holiday schedule).

Problem solved, right? Wrong. His first mistake was he failed to estimate his tax liability and send a check with Form 4868. His next mistake was he didn’t file his tax return by the October due date. Once he filed the extension, he forgot about his tax returns. The beginning of the next year, he realized his mistake, he sent a portion of the tax he thought he would owe and promised himself to complete last year’s tax return and that year’s tax return by the April 15th deadline.

Now, completing the previous tax return became a big task. Many of the records were now hard to locate. So, as the April 15th deadline approached – you guessed it – he filed IRS Form 4868 for an automatic extension. This went on for several years. He would send some money to the IRS every so often to pay his back taxes he knew he would owe had he filed his tax return, but those payments left him no extra money to pay his current IRS obligation.

This family was in the Vicious IRS Circle, or a cascading tax problem. Instead of going away, the problem was growing because of the penalties and interest were growing, and becoming a real danger to their financial future. The problem was growing because they didn’t know how the IRS worked, so they couldn’t come up with a strategy to solve it. That’s when they heard me on the radio and decided to visit my office for a free consultation.

I explained to them that the first step to solving any IRS problem is getting into compliance. In this case, compliance meant filing past tax returns and paying current quarterly estimated taxes as they came due. Those with IRS problems need to focus on the future, rather than worrying about the past. If a taxpayer allows their current IRS obligations to be put aside in favor of paying the older taxes, the vicious circle begins and it becomes nearly impossible for taxpayers to solve the problem by themselves.

If you feel trapped by your IRS problem and want to stop the Vicious IRS Circle, you should contact me right away. My name is Attorney Steven A. Leahy and I help people solve their IRS problems Call me at 312-664-6649. Call now!

My Ex Claimed the Child Deduction – Now What?

by

Steven A. Leahy

My Ex Claimed the Child Deduction – Now What?

By Steven A Leahy

It’s August, and the IRS is starting to go after taxpayers who listed a child as a dependent, when another party listed that same child as a dependent. Who gets the deduction? This is the most common question I get around this time of year.

Here is the typical scenario. Parent A and Parent B live apart. The child lives with Parent A, but Parent B has joint custody. Parent A claims a dependency exemption on their tax return. Later, Parent A discovers Parent B has already claimed a dependency exemption on their tax return. Because a child’s social security number is necessary to claim a dependency exemption, the IRS’ computer system flags both returns and sends a notice of deficiency to each parent. The question rises, “Which Parent is entitled to claim a dependency exemption for tax purposes?”

First, let’s talk about what is at stake. The IRS provides as a deduction an exemption from taxable income ($4,000 for 2015) for each “dependent.” A dependent is defined as either a “qualifying child” or a “qualifying relative” of the taxpayer. To be considered a “qualifying child” of the taxpayer, the child must (among other things) have the same principal place of abode as the taxpayer for more than one-half of the taxable year. In addition, a qualifying child may enable a taxpayer to claim other benefits. Benefits like Head of Household, the child tax credit, the child and dependent care credit, and an earned income tax credit. In total, these benefits amount to thousands of dollars.

Generally, when parents are legally separated or divorced, the dependency exemption is awarded to the custodial parent. The custodial parent is the parent with whom the child lived for the greater number of nights during the year. But there are exceptions. If the custodial parent “signs a written declaration” releasing his or her claim to the exemption and the noncustodial parent “attaches such written declaration to the noncustodial parent’s return for the taxable year” the non-custodial parent can claim the exemption. The declaration by the custodial parent must be made on Form 8332 or in a signed document substantially similar to Form 8332.

Often, the non-custodial parent has a divorce decree, separation agreement, or some other agreement that spells out the rights of the non-custodial parent to claim the deduction. If the decree or agreement went into effect before 2009, the non-custodial parent can attach certain pages to the tax return instead of Form 8332. However, if the decree or agreement went into effect after 2008, the decree or agreement can’t be attached and the non-custodial parent must use Form 8332.

You can see how this can become a problem – parents at odds with who gets the tax benefits. The IRS has sided with the custodial parent; even if the divorce decree or agreement says the custodial parent has agreed to waive the right to claim an exemption for the child. If the custodial parent released a claim to exemption and signed Form 8332 granting the right to the non-custodial parent, the custodial parent can complete Part III of Form 8332 and revoke that waiver, as long as they provide a copy of the form (or make a reasonable effort to provide actual notice) to the non-custodial parent and attach the revocation to their own tax return for each year.

Yes, I know it is complicated. Dealing with the IRS is ALWAYS complicated. If you need help with the IRS, you should work with a local law firm. Better, you should give me a call – Opem Tax Resolutions & The Law Office of Steven A. Leahy, PC (312) 664-6649. Call NOW to set up your FREE Consultation.

Surprise! Your Chances of Paying The IRS Less is Better Than Ever!

by

Steven A. Leahy

Surprise! Your Chances of Paying The IRS Less is Better Than Ever!

By Steven A Leahy

On the IRS Radio Hour (heard every Sunday evening at 5:00 on AM 560 The Answer) I often talk about the six things you can do if you owe the IRS. First, you can pay the IRS everything you owe them. Second, you can set up an installment agreement with the IRS. Pay them over time. Third, you can submit an Offer-in-Compromise, to pay a lump sum to settle the debt. Fourth, you can be declared currently not collectible – prove to the IRS you don’t have any disposable income after you pay all your monthly bills. Fifth, you can file for protection under one of the Chapters of the Bankruptcy laws. And, finally, you can continue to do nothing and let the IRS have their way with you.

The third option, and often the most attractive, is an Offer-in-Compromise (OIC). An OIC is an agreement with the IRS to pay a lump sum as a settlement for the entire IRS debt. Often on radio and television ads, this is the option they refer to when they promise you can pay the IRS “pennies on the dollar.” This promise led to the demise of many national tax resolution companies, because they would charge a client for an OIC, knowing the offer would be rejected. Then charge again for the real remedy.

Historically, the OIC was a bad option because only a small percentage of offers were accepted. For example in 2003 only 17% were approved. In 2014, nearly 40% were accepted! What happened? Why did the acceptance rate more than double in 11 years? What changed?

Well in 2011 the IRS put forth the “Fresh Start Initiative” which changed the OIC program. Before the Fresh Start Initiative the OIC program was limited to those few who had little to zero assets, and could prove they could never pay the IRS. The initiative gave the IRS more flexibility when calculating a taxpayer’s “reasonable collection potential.” The amount the IRS will accept for an Offer-in-Compromise depends on three major factors – the taxpayer’s monthly disposable income, the multiplier, and the taxpayer’s assets. The reasonable collection potential is calculated: (taxpayer’s monthly disposable income) x (the multiplier) + (value of assets).

Disposable income is the difference between a taxpayer’s income and their expenses. The IRS uses national standards when calculating expenses, not the taxpayer’s actual expenses. Historically, the IRS did not consider many of the taxpayer’s actual debts. Under the initiative, the IRS will now allow taxpayer’s to deduct student loan payments and monthly payments for state and local delinquent taxes. The national standards now also include a “miscellaneous” allowance. The miscellaneous allowance can be used for credit card payments and other debts that were previously not considered. The additional expenses will reduce the calculated monthly disposable income.

The biggest change concerns the multiplier used to calculate the amount the IRS will settle the debt. Once a taxpayer’s disposable income is calculated, the IRS uses the multiplier to calculate the cash component. If the taxpayer can pay the lump sum in five or fewer months, the IRS multiplier was 48 (4 years). Now, that multiplier is 12 (1 year). If the taxpayer can pay in 6 to 24 months, the multiplier was reduced to 24 (2years) from 60 (5 years). The decreased multipliers significantly reduce the reasonable collection potential calculated to settle an IRS obligation.

The asset calculation has also been reduced. The IRS will use 80% of the value of assets, overlook some dissipated assets and forego any equity in income producing assets in calculating the asset portion of the offer-in-compromise. All of these changes have the effect of lowering the calculated “reasonable collection potential.”

If you have an IRS problem and are looking to find a way out, maybe the Offer-in-Compromise will be your best option. Find out. Before you do anything, you should give me a call. We can discuss your all your options. Opem Tax Resolutions & The Law Office of Steven A. Leahy, PC (312) 664-6649. Call NOW to set up your FREE Consultation.

Our Resources

Testimonials

Our Office

Our Office has represented Clients throughout Chicago & Northern Illinois. We represent many clients from Cook County; however, we have represented clients from:

DuPage County
Kane County
Kendall County
Grundy County

Lake County
McHenry County
Will County
LaSalle County

We have helped taxpayers in Wisconsin, California, Tennessee, and perhaps your state. No matter where you call home, we look forward to your telephone call for your FREE consultation.