Chicago IRS Tax Attorney

Chicago Tax Team - We help business professionals solve their IRS problems - FOREVER!

Free Consultation

Attorneys Leahy & Sanan – News Review

by

Friday August 19, 2022 – Attorney Steven A. Leahy sits down with Attorney Nishay Sanan to discuss recent news events from a legal perspective.

Attoney Sanan is a frequent guest on the Trust Radio Network and other well known television and radio shows. He has represented high profile defendents in Federal and International “White Collar” crime cases.

Attorney Sanan has a unique view, through experience, of the federal court system, our Constituional system of government and public policy, and he shares that insight with The Trust Radio Network listeners. You won’t want to miss it.

Join Attorney Steven A. Leahy and Attorney Nishay as they explore what is behind the headlines.

Click Here to Reach Attorney Nishay Sanan

Steven A. Leahy is a tax attorney in Illinois. He was the host of the long-running popular Radio Show “The IRS Radio Hour” heard every Sunday evening on AM 560 The Answer. Attorney Leahy is also the author of the book “Deal With Your IRS Problems Today!” You can get a FREE copy of this important book at FreeIRSBook.com. Or Call 24/7 (312)664-6649

The IRS Has A Billion Dollars to Hand Out

by

Steven A. Leahy

The IRS Has A Billion Dollars to Hand Out

You may have heard the news that the IRS is searching for over a million tax payers to hand out more than a billion dollars. Here is what is happening. The IRS has ten years to collect delinquent taxes from taxpayer. This is referred to as the Collection Statute Expiration Date (CSED). However, if the IRS owes taxpayers refunds for tax years with unfiled tax returns, the taxpayer only has three years from the due date to collect this refund. And, if the taxpayer is also entitled to an Earned Income Tax Credit, those funds too, must be claimed within three years of the tax return due date.

If taxpayers have unfiled tax returns and it appears to the IRS there will be a tax liability, the IRS takes it upon themselves to file a Substitute for Return (SFR). The SFR is not a service, it is a penalty! They prepare your taxes in order to assess a tax – the IRS can’t collect a tax that has yet to be assessed. Generally, the SFR overstates the true tax obligation of the taxpayer. However, the IRS begins collection efforts to collect the assessed tax. It may take the IRS some years to assess the tax for an unfiled return – and the CSED does not begin until the tax is assessed. So, the IRS has additional time, from the date of assessment – not from the date the tax return is due, to collect the assessed tax.

If it appears the taxpayer has a refund due, the IRS does not complete the SFR. Therefore, a tax is never assessed, so the IRS does not calculate what your refund would be. They leave it to the taxpayer to calculate that number.

This year, 2017, tax-day is April 18th. This is the second-year tax-day has landed on April 18th rather than April 15th. The reason that is revolves around a little-known Washington DC Holiday, Emancipation Day. Here is the rule:

Generally, if a due date for performing any act for tax purposes falls on a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday, the act is considered to be performed timely if it is performed no later than the next day that isn’t a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday. The term legal holiday means any legal holiday in the District of Columbia. The calendars provided in this publication make the adjustment for Saturdays, Sundays, and legal holidays. But you must make any adjustments for statewide legal holidays, as discussed later.

Emancipation Day is a Washington DC holiday every April 16th. The holiday celebrates the DC Compensated Emancipation Act of 1862 that ended slavery in Washington DC. When April 16 falls on a Saturday, the holiday shifts to Friday. That’s why 2016 tax-day was moved to the next Monday, April 18th. This year, 2017, the holiday falls on a Sunday, so the holiday shifts to the next Monday, April 17th. And, because April 15th is a Saturday, the next day that is not a Saturday, Sunday or holiday is Tuesday April 18th.

Next year, 2018, April 15th will be on Sunday and Emancipation Day will fall on Monday Apirl 16th. Next year, tax-day will fall to Tuesday April 17th.
I have several clients with unfiled tax returns, many dating back before 2013. Several of these clients are W-2 employees, and likely have a refund due. So, we are concentrating on getting their 2013 tax returns completed and filed BEFORE Tuesday April 18, 2017 to make sure they receive credit for the refund they have coming.

If you owe the IRS for taxes pre-dating 2013, and you fail to claim your return timely, the IRS WILL NOT use the refund to offset those taxes. In this situation, Taxpayers are hit with a double whammy.

If you have unfiled tax returns dating back to 2013 – call my office today, right now! We can still complete those returns and get them filed so you can claim your refund. You should give me a call – Opem Tax Resolutions & The Law Office of Steven A. Leahy, PC (312) 664-6649. Call NOW to set up your FREE Consultation.




IRS 1099-A 1099-C Confused Yet?

by

Steven A. Leahy

IRS 1099-A 1099-C Confused Yet?

It’s tax season. Each year, at tax time, many taxpayers receive a 1099 A or a 1099 A and have no idea how to handle them. So, many just ignore the forms and go about filing (or not filing) their tax return. This is a BIG mistake!

Form 1099 C – Cancellation of Debt – is a form used by financial institutions to report cancelled debt to the IRS. “Cancelled Debt” is debt that has been cancelled or forgiven for less than the full amount.

Form 1099 A – Acquisition or Abandonment of Secured Property – is a form used by lenders if they acquire secured property in full or partial satisfaction of a debt, or they have reason to know that the property has been abandoned. Does that make it clear? Who must file? When do you “reasonably know” the property is abandoned? Trying to decipher these definitions is the subject of many Judges’ opinions.

As the borrower, you receive these forms and must respond. But how? Often, a lender will send a 1099 A and a 1099 C. What happens then? If there are multiple borrowers, each may receive a form for the full amount. Whom must report? A borrower may receive multiple forms, if there are multiple lenders to the same piece of property. All good questions – without straight forward answers.

First, Form 1099 A. Typically, a homeowner will receive a 1099 A from a lender(s) after a piece of property is foreclosed. For tax purposes, a foreclosure is treated as a sale. The borrower must calculate capital gains or losses. Since the property wasn’t sold, there isn’t a selling price. Instead, the borrower uses the information on 1099 A as the date of sale [Box 1] and the selling price of the property. The borrower may use the fair market value [Box 4], or the outstanding balance [Box 2]. How to report the foreclosure on your tax return depends on the nature of the property (primary residence?), the state the property is located, and the purchase price.

Next, Form 1099 C. If you receive a 1099 C for a foreclosed property, you should not (but may) receive a 1099 A. Because the 1099 C has the same information as 1099 A, and also includes the additional information that the debt has been cancelled. Cancelled debt may require the borrower to report the cancelled amount as income. That’s right – you couldn’t pay the debt, but the IRS may add the cancelled amount to your gross income and require you to pay income tax on that amount. Talk about kicking you when you’re down.

The good news is, sometimes there are exceptions and often the borrower may exclude the forgiven debt from income. For example, if the debt was discharged in Title 11 Bankruptcy, if the borrower was technically insolvent for an amount greater than the forgiven debt, or if the debt was forgiven on a qualified principal residence.

All this can get VERY complicated! If you receive one or more of these forms in any tax year, I suggest you find a good tax preparer. Do not ignore the forms AND do not prepare your own return. I help people get out of the trouble caused by those you take care to this matter themselves. Get help! Here’s an idea – Call Opem Tax Resolutions & The Law Office of Steven A. Leahy, PC (312) 664-6649. Call NOW to set up your FREE Consultation.




Unpaid Payroll Taxes?

by

Steven A. Leahy

Unpaid Payroll Taxes?

By Steven A Leahy

This week I had the pleasure of meeting a very nice couple. They ran a business that was started by his parents more than 30 years ago. The business has provided a comfortable living for this couple and their family – until last year. Last year they had a big contract that was completed, but their bill went unpaid. This is how financial problems of a customer can spill over to just about any business.

Well, to complete the project required lots of manpower. That manpower required a big payroll. When a business has a payroll, that business is required to deduct federal and state taxes, Medicare and social security obligations, union dues, insurance and perhaps other expenses. The business is then mandated to turn that money, and the business’ own contributions, over to the various government and other entities on behalf of their employees. When that money is not turned over, the IRS will take action to collect the tax portion of those funds.

What happens when the business goes under and is unable to pay the outstanding obligations? Well, if the business was a corporation, or other limited liability entity, the owner may have some protection from the business taxes. However, the portion of the tax obligations that was deducted from the employee’s paycheck was the employees’ property, and the business held that money in trust for the employee.

So, the IRS will look to the person or persons responsible for collecting, accounting and paying over the taxes to the IRS. The IRS defines a “responsible person” as:

One who had the duty to perform or the power to direct the act of collecting, accounting for, or paying over trust fund taxes.

The owner of a business is almost always a “responsible person.” These “trust” taxes include three components: Federal Income tax withheld from the employee; social security and Medicare taxes withheld from the employee; and, the employer’s contribution to social security and Medicare. The “trust” portion is that portion deducted from the employees’ pay check – Federal Income Tax and the employees’ contribution to social security and Medicare. The employer’s contribution to social security and Medicare is not part of the trust taxes, because this tax was not paid by the employee and held in trust by the employer.

When the IRS looks to a responsible person individually to recover this tax, it is referred to as the Trust Fund Recovery Penalty (TFRP). If there is more than one responsible party, the obligation is joint and several – that means the IRS can collect all or part from any or all of the parties. However, the IRS can only recover once. So if the TFRP obligation is satisfied by one responsible party, the obligation of the other parties is also satisfied. Complicated, right?

It gets more complicated, because TFRP are never dischargable in bankruptcy and are difficult to walk away from. But, sometimes, it can be done. If you are having IRS problems you should seek help early. Better yet, you should call me, Steven A. Leahy of Opem Tax Resolutions and The Law Office of Steven A. Leahy, PC. I will sit down with you and explain how this all works and what you can do to protect yourself. Call me today at 312-664-6649. Tell Bonnie I asked you to call to set up a FREE consultation.




My Ex Claimed the Child Deduction – Now What?

by

Steven A. Leahy

My Ex Claimed the Child Deduction – Now What?

By Steven A Leahy

It’s August, and the IRS is starting to go after taxpayers who listed a child as a dependent, when another party listed that same child as a dependent. Who gets the deduction? This is the most common question I get around this time of year.

Here is the typical scenario. Parent A and Parent B live apart. The child lives with Parent A, but Parent B has joint custody. Parent A claims a dependency exemption on their tax return. Later, Parent A discovers Parent B has already claimed a dependency exemption on their tax return. Because a child’s social security number is necessary to claim a dependency exemption, the IRS’ computer system flags both returns and sends a notice of deficiency to each parent. The question rises, “Which Parent is entitled to claim a dependency exemption for tax purposes?”

First, let’s talk about what is at stake. The IRS provides as a deduction an exemption from taxable income ($4,000 for 2015) for each “dependent.” A dependent is defined as either a “qualifying child” or a “qualifying relative” of the taxpayer. To be considered a “qualifying child” of the taxpayer, the child must (among other things) have the same principal place of abode as the taxpayer for more than one-half of the taxable year. In addition, a qualifying child may enable a taxpayer to claim other benefits. Benefits like Head of Household, the child tax credit, the child and dependent care credit, and an earned income tax credit. In total, these benefits amount to thousands of dollars.

Generally, when parents are legally separated or divorced, the dependency exemption is awarded to the custodial parent. The custodial parent is the parent with whom the child lived for the greater number of nights during the year. But there are exceptions. If the custodial parent “signs a written declaration” releasing his or her claim to the exemption and the noncustodial parent “attaches such written declaration to the noncustodial parent’s return for the taxable year” the non-custodial parent can claim the exemption. The declaration by the custodial parent must be made on Form 8332 or in a signed document substantially similar to Form 8332.

Often, the non-custodial parent has a divorce decree, separation agreement, or some other agreement that spells out the rights of the non-custodial parent to claim the deduction. If the decree or agreement went into effect before 2009, the non-custodial parent can attach certain pages to the tax return instead of Form 8332. However, if the decree or agreement went into effect after 2008, the decree or agreement can’t be attached and the non-custodial parent must use Form 8332.

You can see how this can become a problem – parents at odds with who gets the tax benefits. The IRS has sided with the custodial parent; even if the divorce decree or agreement says the custodial parent has agreed to waive the right to claim an exemption for the child. If the custodial parent released a claim to exemption and signed Form 8332 granting the right to the non-custodial parent, the custodial parent can complete Part III of Form 8332 and revoke that waiver, as long as they provide a copy of the form (or make a reasonable effort to provide actual notice) to the non-custodial parent and attach the revocation to their own tax return for each year.

Yes, I know it is complicated. Dealing with the IRS is ALWAYS complicated. If you need help with the IRS, you should work with a local law firm. Better, you should give me a call – Opem Tax Resolutions & The Law Office of Steven A. Leahy, PC (312) 664-6649. Call NOW to set up your FREE Consultation.




Our Resources

Testimonials

Our Office

Our Office has represented Clients throughout Chicago & Northern Illinois. We represent many clients from Cook County; however, we have represented clients from:

DuPage County
Kane County
Kendall County
Grundy County

Lake County
McHenry County
Will County
LaSalle County

We have helped taxpayers in Wisconsin, California, Tennessee, and perhaps your state. No matter where you call home, we look forward to your telephone call for your FREE consultation.