Chicago IRS Tax Attorney

Chicago Tax Team - We help business professionals solve their IRS problems - FOREVER!

Free Consultation

Are You In A Vicious IRS Circle?

by

Steven A. Leahy

Are You In A Vicious IRS Circle?

By Steven A Leahy

Here is the problem I see all the time. Someone has an IRS problem. They work to solve the IRS problem themselves. While they work on fixing their problem, instead of going away, the problem grows. It grows because they fail to address their current IRS obligations.

I helped a family who owed the IRS more than $60,000.00. The father ran his own business. He was very good at his profession – but the paperwork got to be a problem. Several years ago, the April 15th deadline to file his tax return was approaching and he needed more time to complete his tax returns. So, he filed IRS Form 4868 – Application for Automatic Extension of Time to File U.S. Individual Income Tax Return. As the name of the form indicates, the extension is automatic. The filing date is then extended to about October 15 of the same year (depending on the Washington DC holiday schedule).

Problem solved, right? Wrong. His first mistake was he failed to estimate his tax liability and send a check with Form 4868. His next mistake was he didn’t file his tax return by the October due date. Once he filed the extension, he forgot about his tax returns. The beginning of the next year, he realized his mistake, he sent a portion of the tax he thought he would owe and promised himself to complete last year’s tax return and that year’s tax return by the April 15th deadline.

Now, completing the previous tax return became a big task. Many of the records were now hard to locate. So, as the April 15th deadline approached – you guessed it – he filed IRS Form 4868 for an automatic extension. This went on for several years. He would send some money to the IRS every so often to pay his back taxes he knew he would owe had he filed his tax return, but those payments left him no extra money to pay his current IRS obligation.

This family was in the Vicious IRS Circle, or a cascading tax problem. Instead of going away, the problem was growing because of the penalties and interest were growing, and becoming a real danger to their financial future. The problem was growing because they didn’t know how the IRS worked, so they couldn’t come up with a strategy to solve it. That’s when they heard me on the radio and decided to visit my office for a free consultation.

I explained to them that the first step to solving any IRS problem is getting into compliance. In this case, compliance meant filing past tax returns and paying current quarterly estimated taxes as they came due. Those with IRS problems need to focus on the future, rather than worrying about the past. If a taxpayer allows their current IRS obligations to be put aside in favor of paying the older taxes, the vicious circle begins and it becomes nearly impossible for taxpayers to solve the problem by themselves.

If you feel trapped by your IRS problem and want to stop the Vicious IRS Circle, you should contact me right away. My name is Attorney Steven A. Leahy and I help people solve their IRS problems Call me at 312-664-6649. Call now!

My Ex Claimed the Child Deduction – Now What?

by

Steven A. Leahy

My Ex Claimed the Child Deduction – Now What?

By Steven A Leahy

It’s August, and the IRS is starting to go after taxpayers who listed a child as a dependent, when another party listed that same child as a dependent. Who gets the deduction? This is the most common question I get around this time of year.

Here is the typical scenario. Parent A and Parent B live apart. The child lives with Parent A, but Parent B has joint custody. Parent A claims a dependency exemption on their tax return. Later, Parent A discovers Parent B has already claimed a dependency exemption on their tax return. Because a child’s social security number is necessary to claim a dependency exemption, the IRS’ computer system flags both returns and sends a notice of deficiency to each parent. The question rises, “Which Parent is entitled to claim a dependency exemption for tax purposes?”

First, let’s talk about what is at stake. The IRS provides as a deduction an exemption from taxable income ($4,000 for 2015) for each “dependent.” A dependent is defined as either a “qualifying child” or a “qualifying relative” of the taxpayer. To be considered a “qualifying child” of the taxpayer, the child must (among other things) have the same principal place of abode as the taxpayer for more than one-half of the taxable year. In addition, a qualifying child may enable a taxpayer to claim other benefits. Benefits like Head of Household, the child tax credit, the child and dependent care credit, and an earned income tax credit. In total, these benefits amount to thousands of dollars.

Generally, when parents are legally separated or divorced, the dependency exemption is awarded to the custodial parent. The custodial parent is the parent with whom the child lived for the greater number of nights during the year. But there are exceptions. If the custodial parent “signs a written declaration” releasing his or her claim to the exemption and the noncustodial parent “attaches such written declaration to the noncustodial parent’s return for the taxable year” the non-custodial parent can claim the exemption. The declaration by the custodial parent must be made on Form 8332 or in a signed document substantially similar to Form 8332.

Often, the non-custodial parent has a divorce decree, separation agreement, or some other agreement that spells out the rights of the non-custodial parent to claim the deduction. If the decree or agreement went into effect before 2009, the non-custodial parent can attach certain pages to the tax return instead of Form 8332. However, if the decree or agreement went into effect after 2008, the decree or agreement can’t be attached and the non-custodial parent must use Form 8332.

You can see how this can become a problem – parents at odds with who gets the tax benefits. The IRS has sided with the custodial parent; even if the divorce decree or agreement says the custodial parent has agreed to waive the right to claim an exemption for the child. If the custodial parent released a claim to exemption and signed Form 8332 granting the right to the non-custodial parent, the custodial parent can complete Part III of Form 8332 and revoke that waiver, as long as they provide a copy of the form (or make a reasonable effort to provide actual notice) to the non-custodial parent and attach the revocation to their own tax return for each year.

Yes, I know it is complicated. Dealing with the IRS is ALWAYS complicated. If you need help with the IRS, you should work with a local law firm. Better, you should give me a call – Opem Tax Resolutions & The Law Office of Steven A. Leahy, PC (312) 664-6649. Call NOW to set up your FREE Consultation.

What Organization is Tougher Than The IRS?

by

Steven A. Leahy

What Organization is Tougher Than The IRS?

By Steven A Leahy

Remember, there are only 6 things you can do if you owe the IRS money. Before you hire someone to help you resolve your IRS problem, make sure they offer you every option possible. Many (most) tax resolution companies are not law firms – even if they have an attorney working for them. That means they can’t offer you all your options.

Let us review the six things you can do. First, you can pay the IRS everything you owe them. Second, you can set up an installment agreement with the IRS. Pay them over time. Third, you can submit an Offer-in-Compromise, to pay a lump sum to settle the debt. Fourth, you can be declared currently not collectible – prove to the IRS you don’t have any disposable income after you pay all your monthly bills. Fifth, you can file for protection under one of the Chapters of the Bankruptcy laws. And, finally, you can continue to do nothing and let the IRS have their way with you.

Sometimes, the very best option – clearly – is filing for protection under the bankruptcy code. Unless the tax resolution company you talk to is a law firm experienced in bankruptcy – and non-attorneys can never be qualified to offer you advice about bankruptcy – you may never even be exposed to that option.

Most of my clients owe the IRS a sizable amount of money – and many are what can be defined as “above-median debtors.” That means their monthly income exceeds the median (average) income for the household of the same size as the debtors’ in the same state of residence. For these taxpayers, working out a solution with the IRS can be very difficult because, often, the IRS will not allow all of their actual expenses when determining a remedy. If their mortgage is higher than the IRS allows, their payments or settlement with the IRS will be too high to allow both payments. This may force the taxpayer out of their home or cause a default with the IRS agreement.

The only organization stronger than the IRS is the Federal Court System. That is why bankruptcy is sometimes the best option. If the IRS is insisting that you give up your home, they won’t release a levy or they insist on an unreasonable monthly payment, bankruptcy may be the answer.

For example, I have an above-median couple who has a large IRS obligation, a very high mortgage payment and find themselves behind on their mortgage payments. The IRS insisted on full payment over a short period of time; a payment that would not allow them to keep their home.

Under Chapter 13, the federal bankruptcy law changes the focus of their repayment plan from repayment of the IRS debt, to keeping their home. Under their Chapter 13 plan, these taxpayers will pay their monthly mortgage, pay down the mortgage arrears and pay the IRS a small portion of the IRS claim.

I had another client who came to see me after the IRS levied his employer – leaving him with zero income. We negotiated with the IRS Revenue Officer for a time, put he would not relent and release the levy. My client was concerned that he would be evicted from his apartment if he missed his rent payment. The day he filed for protection under the bankruptcy code, the IRS was forced to release the levy, my client received his pay check, paid his rent and proposed a plan to pay his creditors over five years.

These remedies aren’t possible in many (most) tax resolution firms. Taxes under the bankruptcy laws can get very complicated. That is why it is vital that you seek help from someone who can offer all available remedies, including bankruptcy. So, if you find yourself with an IRS Problem, call Opem Tax Resolutions and The Law Office of Steven A. Leahy at 312-664-6649.

Solving Your IRS Problem – And Keeping it Solved!

by

Steven A. Leahy

Solving Your IRS Problem – And Keeping it Solved!

By Steven A Leahy

Listeners to the IRS Radio Hour – heard every Sunday afternoon at 5:00 on AM 560 The Answer – know I help people and businesses solve their IRS problems. What I have learned is – solving the IRS problem is only step one. The next step is keeping the problem solved.

When you reach an agreement with the IRS – whether the remedy is an offer-in-compromise, installment agreement or being declared currently not collectible – there are other conditions of the agreement, conditions often overlooked by taxpayers. For example, here are the conditions included in a recent installment agreement we worked out for a client with the IRS. The IRS wrote:

The other conditions of this agreement are:

– You file and pay on time all federal and state taxes due during the term of the agreement.

– We’ll apply all installment agreement payments to the oldest tax assessments first, then penalties, then interest on that assessment.

– You pay all installment agreement user fees.

– You provide a current financial statement when we request one. If you have a change in your ability to pay, we can revise or cancel your installment agreement.

In addition, the IRS will “apply any refunds you’re due to the amount you owe until you pay your balance in full. A refund payment isn’t a substitute for a monthly payment.”

The first condition is the most common stumbling block. Taxpayers often fail to file and pay all federal and state taxes on time. On time, to the IRS, means NO EXTENSIONS. If you fail to meet any of these conditions, the IRS will cancel the agreement and the taxpayer will find themselves right back where they started.

That’s why, once we solve a client’s IRS problem we offer to continue monitoring the case under our IRS Protection Plan. Under the IRS Protection Plan, we continue covering our client with our Power of Attorney, so we continue to receive all IRS notices. We offer on-going advice about tax issues and we complete their annual tax returns. Occasionally the IRS will erroneously cancel an agreement, or cancel an agreement but agree to re-instate the agreement after a request is submitted. Our IRS protection plan covers those items too. In addition, if you do default, we will offer a discounted rate to work with the IRS on a new agreement.

Even if you don’t default, some agreements, such as partial installment agreements or currently not collectible status may be reviewed after some time, typically every 2 years. And the IRS Protection Plan will provide a discounted rate for that service also.

So, even after you fix your IRS problem, you have to remain vigilant. That’s where Opem Tax Resolutions and The Law Office of Steven A. Leahy, PC comes in with the IRS Protection Plan. Give me a call at 312-664-6640 to fix your IRS problem and KEEP the problem fixed!

Surprise! Your Chances of Paying The IRS Less is Better Than Ever!

by

Steven A. Leahy

Surprise! Your Chances of Paying The IRS Less is Better Than Ever!

By Steven A Leahy

On the IRS Radio Hour (heard every Sunday evening at 5:00 on AM 560 The Answer) I often talk about the six things you can do if you owe the IRS. First, you can pay the IRS everything you owe them. Second, you can set up an installment agreement with the IRS. Pay them over time. Third, you can submit an Offer-in-Compromise, to pay a lump sum to settle the debt. Fourth, you can be declared currently not collectible – prove to the IRS you don’t have any disposable income after you pay all your monthly bills. Fifth, you can file for protection under one of the Chapters of the Bankruptcy laws. And, finally, you can continue to do nothing and let the IRS have their way with you.

The third option, and often the most attractive, is an Offer-in-Compromise (OIC). An OIC is an agreement with the IRS to pay a lump sum as a settlement for the entire IRS debt. Often on radio and television ads, this is the option they refer to when they promise you can pay the IRS “pennies on the dollar.” This promise led to the demise of many national tax resolution companies, because they would charge a client for an OIC, knowing the offer would be rejected. Then charge again for the real remedy.

Historically, the OIC was a bad option because only a small percentage of offers were accepted. For example in 2003 only 17% were approved. In 2014, nearly 40% were accepted! What happened? Why did the acceptance rate more than double in 11 years? What changed?

Well in 2011 the IRS put forth the “Fresh Start Initiative” which changed the OIC program. Before the Fresh Start Initiative the OIC program was limited to those few who had little to zero assets, and could prove they could never pay the IRS. The initiative gave the IRS more flexibility when calculating a taxpayer’s “reasonable collection potential.” The amount the IRS will accept for an Offer-in-Compromise depends on three major factors – the taxpayer’s monthly disposable income, the multiplier, and the taxpayer’s assets. The reasonable collection potential is calculated: (taxpayer’s monthly disposable income) x (the multiplier) + (value of assets).

Disposable income is the difference between a taxpayer’s income and their expenses. The IRS uses national standards when calculating expenses, not the taxpayer’s actual expenses. Historically, the IRS did not consider many of the taxpayer’s actual debts. Under the initiative, the IRS will now allow taxpayer’s to deduct student loan payments and monthly payments for state and local delinquent taxes. The national standards now also include a “miscellaneous” allowance. The miscellaneous allowance can be used for credit card payments and other debts that were previously not considered. The additional expenses will reduce the calculated monthly disposable income.

The biggest change concerns the multiplier used to calculate the amount the IRS will settle the debt. Once a taxpayer’s disposable income is calculated, the IRS uses the multiplier to calculate the cash component. If the taxpayer can pay the lump sum in five or fewer months, the IRS multiplier was 48 (4 years). Now, that multiplier is 12 (1 year). If the taxpayer can pay in 6 to 24 months, the multiplier was reduced to 24 (2years) from 60 (5 years). The decreased multipliers significantly reduce the reasonable collection potential calculated to settle an IRS obligation.

The asset calculation has also been reduced. The IRS will use 80% of the value of assets, overlook some dissipated assets and forego any equity in income producing assets in calculating the asset portion of the offer-in-compromise. All of these changes have the effect of lowering the calculated “reasonable collection potential.”

If you have an IRS problem and are looking to find a way out, maybe the Offer-in-Compromise will be your best option. Find out. Before you do anything, you should give me a call. We can discuss your all your options. Opem Tax Resolutions & The Law Office of Steven A. Leahy, PC (312) 664-6649. Call NOW to set up your FREE Consultation.

Our Resources

Testimonials

Our Office

Our Office has represented Clients throughout Chicago & Northern Illinois. We represent many clients from Cook County; however, we have represented clients from:

DuPage County
Kane County
Kendall County
Grundy County

Lake County
McHenry County
Will County
LaSalle County

We have helped taxpayers in Wisconsin, California, Tennessee, and perhaps your state. No matter where you call home, we look forward to your telephone call for your FREE consultation.